Leigh
Made at Home
- Joined
- 17/10/07
- Messages
- 1,180
- Reaction score
- 1
Yeh, some were classic. Never mind.
So far it seems, no-one has been able to punch holes in my hypothesis on Marco Polo. No scientific paper would leave "unknown" anywhere in a comparative analysis unless there is a very good reason. Yes, I think the Chinese would know EXACTLY its origins and breeding. The paper is probably leaving it as unknown for legal reasons. Yes it does happen in the scientific world too, that papers are "adjusted" for a host of legal reaons.
Still think the reason is Marco Polo is a copy or deriviative of a copywrited hop. whether its "simcoe" or another doesn't phase me, BUT columbus!!!!!!!!!, well big doubts.
Graham Sanders
Craftbrewer
Skype "Craftbrewer"
http://radio.craftbrewer.org
edit
oh, and another nail in the coffin of columbus, giving more credence to it being a copywrited hop of high quality, Why the hell is it soooo much more expensive than all the other hops
You claim earlier that it appears in a scientific journal, is peer reviewed, so must be correct...I'm afraid this shows you know little of scientific publishing...
You can literally get anything published in a peer reviewed scientific journal. Also consider that the top scientific journals quite often print papers that are peer reviewed and are completely contradictory...
Love your work, but I have to agree that you do jump to conclusions far too easily.
The simple explanation is they truly did not know the origin...and peer reviewers rarely add missing information...they are reviewers not contributors!