Brewer_010
Curry Master
- Joined
- 3/2/07
- Messages
- 541
- Reaction score
- 1
Windsor dry yeast. I brewed an IPA last year with it, beautiful malt profile and then the finish was bananery and non-flocculating soup. I was gutted.
Another one which many don't like is the Wyeast American Ale II, 1272. I really like this yeast, but many find it too nutty or something. For me, it doesn't strip the beer of body like US-05 can do, and is an excellent beer for loads of different styles. :chug:
t2000kw
checkout craftbrewer in australia.
I found Wyeast 1028 London Ale to be Uber minerally... that was before i was doing wter additions. It was like there was a crapload of minerally carbonates in the beer. Wasnt much of a fan. Might try it again in the future but not anytime soon.
Thanks!!!
At first I thought it wasn't there, then I searched the page text for 97 and found it under CraftBrewer German Ale (Twin Pack 2 x 12gm).
Now I have to find out from them how much shipping wold cost to see if it's worth getting, and if so, how many I'd need to buy to make it worth the extra shipping from there to here.
But not having to buy a large brick of it may make it worth getting!
Donald
Having the exact same experience with this yeast now. Mineral profile is overwhelming and giving the porter I'm doing a much much dryer feel than I wanted. I believe that Mountain Goat (and other breweries) use this yeast a lot, and although it's been ages since I had one of their beers, I'm sure they keep this characteristic under control.
Anyone got a tip for controlling the mineral profile of 1028?
US-05
S-04. Not keen. Ive used it some in mine and tasted others brews who have used it. Just not keen.
cheers
Andrew.
US-05
I have been wrestling with 1318 for a few months... haven't got close to the ester style I am after, and it is very erratic in behaviour. The search continues for a house yeast. Next batting is 1026, though with serious consideration regarding availability.
Enter your email address to join: