Does anyone use PVC as a manifold?
Rook
I've been Brewing in a Bag BIAB for a while now ...and enjoying the results immensly!
However, I'm looking to maximise my output and "double batch" ...to produce around 45L of wort.
I already have a 55L vessel, which I use for my single batch BIAB, and I'm about to purchase a 120L vessel to upgrademy system.
What I want to know is if my "grain bag" (which completely lines the 55L vessel) could be used as the false bottom of I make the 55L my mash tun?
The "bag" is made from fine nylon voille (cutain material) and allows no grain/husks/bits to escape to the wort.
I'd be batch sparging, BTW.
So ....what do you reckon? I'll probably give it a go anyway, but, I'd like the "experts" opinion.
i used to get 60% eff with bucket in bucket. no big deal, just use slightly more malt.
I'd hardly call 70% shithouse efficiency.
$60 buy a lot of malt.
errrr yea...beerbelly thats what i meant..err
Roger what sort of eff do you get with it? and how much was it? edit $60
add more malt, use less water :beer:6kgs and 18litres of water.
I was attempting to explain my setup to a couple of guys at the QLD case swap over the weekend... so i decided it would be easier to take a few pics and show them instead..
My tun has its tap in the bottom center..
View attachment 14022
Here is my Mash tun its hinged for easy spent grain dumping..
View attachment 14021
i made up a manifold that also supports the false bottom.
There are three arms off the centerpoint of the manifold that have holes drilled on the underside... and the base ring also has tiny holes all the way around so it drains completly and there is no "deadspace" at all...
Manifold from the top and from underneath
View attachment 14017View attachment 14018
manifold with the false bottom attached.
View attachment 14019
Tun with with manifold and FB removed
View attachment 14020
Tun with Manifold only..
View attachment 14023
Sqyre...
Enter your email address to join: