Wonderwoman
Well-Known Member
I was incognito yesterdayMartinOC said:Thanks Wonderwoman (I don't remember seeing seeing your red & gold lycra suit today, but maybe that's the effect of your "lassoo of truth"?).
I was incognito yesterdayMartinOC said:Thanks Wonderwoman (I don't remember seeing seeing your red & gold lycra suit today, but maybe that's the effect of your "lassoo of truth"?).
Thanks. Yes it was the 2015 Swap Beer. So I guess technically it's a 4th for all of usGrumpyPaul said:Well done Russ - Strong Scotch Ale....wouldnt be your 2015 Swap meet beer would it????
thats Ok I did the same with my Stout we brewed at the swap at Yobs a few years back. It placed 5thNullnvoid said:Thanks. Yes it was the 2015 Swap Beer. So I guess technically it's a 4th for all of us
Yep - I will. Pretty stoked with the results, pipped by Kris by a point by my reckoning. Huge thanks to all involved, judges, stewards and especially the vicbrew committee. P****d off I couldn't make it this year as last year was a blast.GrumpyPaul said:Well done to all.
A huge amount of "No Clubbers" this year.
Phil Rayner - whoever you are, please join Melbourne brewers.
Same here mate. My IPA scored around the 44's at Pale Ale Mania comp few weeks ago but was second last in this. Something must of went wrong in that bottle haha. Look forward to the score sheet.dannymars said:My RIS came 4th...
pipped at the post by Yob by 1 point.
On the flip side, my IIPA seems to have secured the lowest score in the entire comp... lol
A fourth only separated from third on count back hurts the most :lol:Yob said:BnT you prick!!
got me on countback and nudged me to fourth in specialty :lol:
You may still get the call-up for the Nationals if one of the place-getters can't field a beer.Black n Tan said:A fourth only separated from third on count back hurts the most :lol:
I agree, Grant should sit this one outWarmerBeer said:You may still get the call-up for the Nationals if one of the place-getters can't field a beer.
Has happened before (from 1st hand experience)
Usually separated on countback: often the beer with the narrowest point spread comes top, even though the point totals are identical.dannymars said:Looks like 3/4 & 5 all had the same score in specialty ... How does that work?
Might want to check the scoresheet for that, I recall there being an IIPA that came back with a very, very low score, because it wasn't actually an IIPA... We were pretty sure it was in the wrong category.dannymars said:On the flip side, my IIPA seems to have secured the lowest score in the entire comp... lol
I'm kinda hoping that you've already got that same beer ready to go in a bottle & don't have to go sucking the dregs out of multiple kegs/barrels & mixing them to fill an entry... h34r:Yob said:When do place getters need to have their entries for nationals ready?
Aha! I wondered why you were rather "subdued". Yob was still ferociously hungover from his Saturday night indulgences & I had to go & get him a very large, triple-shot coffee with LOTS of sugar to get him back on track..Spiesy said:Only wish I wasn't so wrecked before getting there!
Was that you I spotted lifting 20 full crates with one hand??wonderwoman said:I was incognito yesterday
The Committee discussed a "Wooden-Spoon" award a few years ago as bit of a laugh & to encourage improvement. I might bring it up again in this year's debrief.dannymars said:my IIPA seems to have secured the lowest score in the entire comp... lol
Excellent work! That's the kind of thinking-Steward I like to have on my team. Obviously, I didn't see the scoresheets, or I would've done that myself. Good stuff.droid said:I did send back (via Mort) some scoresheets from a couple of tables that had sections completely blank. Hopefully those brewers will now have some decent feedback.
Countback. Here's how we do it:dannymars said:Looks like 3/4 & 5 all had the same score in specialty ... How does that work?
Not gonna happen mate. The Nationals run on having only 3 entries from each participating State, thus restricting the number of beers judged by each panel. It would be wrong to "weight" the entries towards Victorians.GrumpyPaul said:I reckon given the tightness of the 3 equal thirds there would be a good argument for the Vicbrew committee to get dispensation for 1st, 2nd and the three =3rds to be entered into AABC.
All those in favor of the Vicbrew committee appraoching the AABC commitee say AYE
I also recall that particular beer. Any chance you got beers mixed up?moonhead said:Might want to check the scoresheet for that, I recall there being an IIPA that came back with a very, very low score, because it wasn't actually an IIPA... We were pretty sure it was in the wrong category.
Here, here.idzy said:Well done to Mort, Martin and the committee. Was very smooth on Saturday and I'm sure it continued the same on Sunday.
Most importantly, well done to those who got a result they were happy with and hopefully some constructive tasting notes to continue improving.
GalBrew said:I also recall that particular beer. Any chance you got beers mixed up?
moonhead said:Might want to check the scoresheet for that, I recall there being an IIPA that came back with a very, very low score, because it wasn't actually an IIPA... We were pretty sure it was in the wrong category.
I'd be seeing if some of the other low scoring ones were marked down for being overly hoppy and alcoholic for the style! (Looking at Southern English Brown Ale @ 39, to begin with...) Wonder if there was a label mix up?dannymars said:On the flip side, my IIPA seems to have secured the lowest score in the entire comp... lol
Enter your email address to join: