djar007 said:
Glad to hear your time in the job has been recognised manticle. Only two things that cause me stress at work. Pay. And training.
Actually been pushing for a pay rise for casuals since may - originally through line manager, now through union when that proved ineffective. I've been there 10 years and I was, until today on the same pay point (not just band but point within that band) as when I started.
I train people regularly who are on the same point as me. Unlike most workplaces, our casuals are paid at a much lower band than the full time staff as the casuals are seen as inexperienced assistants. However people like myself and quite a few others have vast amounts of experience and a unique skill set that supports the department (and full time staff). This experience and these skills are useful to the department and the institution as a whole and are recognised as being so by many staff members, including staff from other departments. Recognition involves being asked/required to carry out duties that are similar to those carried out by our full time and senior full time staff yet we get paid significantly less (even after calculating casual loading) than those staff members.
This disparity is what I am trying to change (and we are talking between 7 and 20,000 a year difference in pay and when you are below national and state average already, that is a lot). It will be a long road.
Recently a proposed restructure was announced and our department was one of the most affected in terms of extra expected responsibility (we essentially absorb another entire department and their responsibilities). Full time staff from management down all were offered a pay band increase. Casuals remained where they were so the disparity already existing would increase.
This is the case being heard by Fair Work at the moment (whole restructure - not just this issue) as the institution are in breach of their EBA/WPA on a number of levels.
Anyway the recent thing with new casuals being employed at a higher rate than pre-existing was additional to all this and seemed to myself and others pushing for better pay like a kick in the face. It's definitely not battle over as we are simply back where we were when we first started to push a little (underpaid and paid the same as the staff we train) but at least, as of today, we are not paid LESS than the staff we train which is what has unfortunately been happening since September.
I start a senior full time position before the end of this month but I'd like to see the fuckers respect their long term casual staff regardless. They consider me experienced enough to employ as a senior after 10 years, they can't really look me in the eye and tell me my role differs from full time and senior full time staff and therefore is worth less than some people earn working in a bakery.