Mister Wilson
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 14/2/11
- Messages
- 161
- Reaction score
- 4
You are a champion. Received this morning and will hopefully get a brew out on the weekend.HBHB said:Should only be 4 sleeps away
You are a champion. Received this morning and will hopefully get a brew out on the weekend.HBHB said:Should only be 4 sleeps away
Over 100 brews down the track with our unit, which was a pre-release model (same version as all the early adopters got) averaged out is 76. We've had a couple of lower efficiencies, depending on how guys crushed their grain (a fair few have down their own). I believe the lowest efficiency has been about 62 or 63% on a 9.00kg batch which was way too coarse in the crush. The highest was in the high 80's. All of mine averaged out is a little over 76 when milled at the same settings.I think there's a bunch of figures from the earlier brews back several pages on here.Buckskin said:just wondering what efficiency you guys are getting from the GF....I follow the instructions in the manual to a T (60 minute mash at 67C, 15 minute mashout at 75C, sparge at 75C per GF calculations)
I cant get over 73% but have heard of people getting 80% with the GF...any idea why?
Unfortunately that's not what that word means. Any usage of -less as a suffix means without, cannot or unable to.HBHB said:Keep in mind that stainless steel is exactly that - it stains less.
I think the word you were looking for is Now, Parks.Parks said:Unfortunately that's not what that word means. Any usage of -less as a suffix means without, cannot or unable to.
The fact it's called stainless is more of a misnomer.
No I will fly off to correct many other wrong people on the internet!
Is that like editing it sneakily?Parks said:Dammit - I can't even sneaky edit!
Enter your email address to join: