Liam_snorkel
كافر
- Joined
- 16/9/08
- Messages
- 5,800
- Reaction score
- 2,875
It is in children, and old people.
bum said:Pretty much any definition for intelligence that has ever been taken seriously by the scientific community involves the concept learning from experience. Experience is something that can only come with time.
Stating that an adult is less intelligent than a child does not negate a child's capacity for intelligence and reading it as such is entirely false.
An inability to comprehend sentences formed in "normal" language where jargon is completely absent might be considered a useful indicator of intelligence, however.punkin said:The ability to construct incomprehensible sentences is not an indicator of intelligence.
What the ungodly **** are you talking about?punkin said:So your contention is that bright kids often turn into dullard adults, and two year olds that can barley talk often turn into world leaders? (baring environmental factors like drugs ect)?
Not saying they always reach their potential, but it takes a huge environmental factor to take that intelligence away.
Bribie G said:My son won several silver medals in QLD mathematics, then in year 12 the Australian Stock Exchange ran a comp in schools where students could download a program and receive an initial sum of fantasy dollars to invest in shares over a one year period. Boy won and was featured on Channel 9.
Went to the most prestigious uni in QLD to study Minerals Engineering. Didn't like it. Dropped out.
For the last 5 years he delivers pizza and loves the job, bought a new car recently. Fecked if I know.
But it isn't everyone else. It is, as you say, the same people. You can ascribe whatever intelligence to them that you wish - that is up to you.punkin said:But has he got stupid?
Or did you know when he was 1 that he was a smart guy?
Anus, i am saying that because you can construct a sentence to make other people look small, does not make you look big.
Do you find that you are having the same argument with the same stupid people all the time?
I see that you are.
Perhaps it's not everyone else?
Punkin was this an intentional pun - barley (on a brewing site) rather than barely?punkin said:So your contention is that bright kids often turn into dullard adults, and two year olds that can barley talk often turn into world leaders? (baring environmental factors like drugs ect)?
Not saying they always reach their potential, but it takes a huge environmental factor to take that intelligence away.
My experience is that bright kids turn into bright people, and vice versa. And i've had lots of experience with bright kids.
The fact that you turn people inside out with rhetoric says more about you than others. It's just that you feel big about making others feel small.
I see your point Bum. Punkins original point stated that intelligence isn't related to age. However i think as bum said experience does give intelligence. For instance this smart 1 year wouldn't be smarter then 99% of the 30 year old s in this world. If this same child didn't have any outside help from education. would he be as smart when he grows up?bum said:But it isn't everyone else. It is, as you say, the same people. You can ascribe whatever intelligence to them that you wish - that is up to you.
The posts you've taken issue with here do not set out to make anyone feel small. If someone does happen to feel small because of some completely imagined ******** then there isn't a great deal I can do about that. I feel like we've had this discussion before?
Can someone else please explain to me how it might be possible that punkin has understood my posts as he has (when it seems pretty clear to me that my posts are entirely removed from the meaning he wishes to give them)?