daemon
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2/10/07
- Messages
- 498
- Reaction score
- 24
Wow, what a great read in this thread. Diacetyl is something I'm not good at detecting and it's interesting to read what effect people have had with different malts.
Like Tony and others have pointed out, it's not going to be a fault or a missed step in Tony's brewing process (seeing as he has a small bit of experience ). I moved nearly 12 months ago from Toowoomba to Ipswich and while I haven't been able to brew much (thanks to mother nature), I've certainly noticed the difference that water chemistry and environment can make. With all the same equipment, same grain from the same bag, same hops / yeast etc, I've made beers now that are notably different (and different faults!).
I still like US05 as a plain yeast in basic beers but prefer 1272 in APA's, especially since it the flocculation is much better and it's a great match to hoppy beers.
Like Tony and others have pointed out, it's not going to be a fault or a missed step in Tony's brewing process (seeing as he has a small bit of experience ). I moved nearly 12 months ago from Toowoomba to Ipswich and while I haven't been able to brew much (thanks to mother nature), I've certainly noticed the difference that water chemistry and environment can make. With all the same equipment, same grain from the same bag, same hops / yeast etc, I've made beers now that are notably different (and different faults!).
I still like US05 as a plain yeast in basic beers but prefer 1272 in APA's, especially since it the flocculation is much better and it's a great match to hoppy beers.