If you can supposedly get botulism from no-chill cube, what about from a FWK? I've used a few of the cubes from G&G and have definitely suffered from some of the symptons listed in a previous post - nausea, blurred vision, yadda yadda yadda. In fact, most Friday nights i get it.
ALso, if HDPE is better than PE, does anyone know if cubes and fermenters from Bunnings are HD or not? Or, just like TVs, is HD a marketing scam? Where can I get a true HD PE cube?
hazard
The original post and qouted post by Fatgodzilla nominated a wall thickness of 1mm, (or 40mil, but presumaby he means .040"or 40 thousands of an inch).
Has anyone ever verified it's as thin as 1mm?
My guess is that it's thicker than that, and if so, the calculations will vary enormously.
Well being a lurker and sometime poster from the USA I will give a bit of my thoughts.
I think it comes down to either you are better brewers or you have been raised on crap beer and dont know any better. I think you are better brewers.
I say that because anyone that brews out of cans over here is thought of as some cave man that would drink sewer water and think it was some kind of fancy ass bottled water. Then the people that brew with bulk liquid extract or dry malt extract are tolerated as beginners that do not know any better. They are converted to extract with added grains as a step to real brewing. So everyone knows you are not a real home brewer unless you brew all grain with all the fancy equipment piled in the extra room or garage. Funny part of that is I never heard of having a brew room or shed until I visited this site.
So once you understand that the mind of American home brewers, the ones that are active on the forums, have been brain washed into thinking that unless you brew all grain with the pile of equipment and the endless selection of hops and yeast you are not doing it the right way. Then you can understand why any question, or suggestion, of doing it different is religiously rejected.
I have given up on trying to convert them. I just look at what they are brewing and get recipe ideas and leave the rest.
The odd thing about all the equipment is if a competition was held you would win as I have read about some much more complicated brew systems on this forum then on any of the American sites. A fancy system here is 3 kegs with the top cut out and all connected by a confusing tangle of pipes and valves. It includes 2 gas burners and maybe one pump all setting on a heavy metal stand. Those same Aussie brewers with all the equipment will still help the K&K brewer and not think bad of them.
I have not even touched on what they read. Once an idea is put in a book it is gospel. If it is written in a magazine it is debated until some dope, that does not even know what they are writing, puts it in a book. Things like dont squeeze the bag, HSA, heat extracts tannins so dont boil the grains (they must have never heard of decoction), and my favorite if you can drink the water you can brew beer.
So if you ever get into a discussion with an American home brewer remember it is like talking religion or politics. You will not convert them even if they say your BIAB no-chill beer is the best they have ever had.
A # 2 inside the recycling triangle indicates HDPE
got to do something to kill off this thread.
All these new fellas must not of seen the epic "no chill method" thread and "Users of the no chill method".
So if you ever get into a discussion with an American home brewer remember it is like talking religion or politics. You will not convert them even if they say your BIAB no-chill beer is the best they have ever had.
Oxigen is toxic for Clostridium botulinum.
I'll quote myself here:
Seriously though, who does? I'd say the evidence found through practice has far outweighed any claim that it may be hazardous or detrimental. So why the argument in the first place?
Cheers - boingk
First off, my initial post was seriously overly negative, I actually think its a good discussion going on here. I still think its a bit pointless though. I was under the impression that botulinum toxin was something that was quite rare and was easily destroyed at temperatures exceeding 60'C, as well as being inhibited by the presence of oxygen. I wasn't sure so checked it out on Wikipedia. The article is here for anyone wanting some more info.
In any event I'd say developing botulism in a brew is a sufficiently unlikely occurance, when practises concerning brewing are sanitary, that it can be dispensed of as an issue of concern. I'm not denying that it happens, but merely saying that with proper practices (yes, including no chill) you would be hard-pushed to encounter a case of botulism in your beer over a lifetime.
Cheers all, and sorry about my angry rant further up the thread.
- boingk
Cheers ronin, yeah I got my wires crossed on the botulism oxygen thingo - thanks for that one! Missed Braufraus post, too...think I need another coffee, not feeling too crash hot today. Interesting to see that even 1IBU worth of hopping is enough. Looks like we'll continue sitting pretty then.
Meanwhile, preparations for brewing this avo with the brother must continue. This stout (although technically a robust porter) won't make itself...
Cheers - boingk
:icon_offtopic:Meanwhile, preparations for brewing this avo with the brother must continue. This stout (although technically a robust porter) won't make itself...
Enter your email address to join: