Ducatiboy stu
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2/4/05
- Messages
- 14,269
- Reaction score
- 3,832
mmm... I am kinda warming to Putin ( in a non climatic way )
First it was "Global Warming" and when this was found to be unsustainable as an argument it became "Climate Change" and now because of the inability to adequately explain the the "so called pause" in predicted temperature rise over recent times there is another shift in terminology to "Climate Disruption"Blind Dog said:This. If climate change is wrong and we try to do something about it, the worst case scenario is that we might slow or pause economic growth. If climate change is right and we do nothing, we're ******. Not ****** as in Australia losing the ashes again (I'm a POM, it's an ancient English law that I have to mention it), but ****** as in gone, done, dusted, sayonara human life on earth. Personally, I don't give a **** who's right, but I'm voting for the party who understand what at stake.
Stupid NASA...always getting it wrong and manipulating the datawobbly said:Because there hasn't been an increase in the global temperature in the past nearly 20 years (acknowledged in the 5th IPCC Report) the "Scientists" are now of the view that this unexpected "Pause" in temperature rise is due to the heat being stored at the bottom of "Deep Oceans"!! This seems to fly in the face of proven "Science" that even in water heat rises.
So do you deny that the earths mean temperature has risen ?. Because if you dont deny it, can you please explain the how the correlation between CO2 levels and temperature risewobbly said:I'm not a denier of rising CO2 levels in the atmosphere as "Science" can measure that
Of course you'll be howled down as that is not evidence. It's a blog FFS. Do you even understand what evidence is? Your confirmation bias is impressive. It's like arguing with my 5yo daughter.wobbly said:Maybe my intelligence paused at age 6 then again just maybe it didn't.
I can't personally provide the evidence you request but I can suggest that not all the papers freely available are rubbish either.
I'm sure that this reference will be howled down as being the the work of the deniers and the left rubbish media but it reportedly uses the same data set as used by the IPCC and other "Scientists" as well as including data sets/graphs conveniently omitted from reports and presentations or adequately explained by those championing the predictions as to why the significant differences exist between predictions and actual's
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/09/04/the-pause-lengthens-yet-again/
Wobbly
could you perhaps personally provide some peer reviewed proof then, rather than just some guys blog?wobbly said:Maybe my intelligence paused at age 6 then again just maybe it didn't.
I can't personally provide the evidence you request but I can suggest that not all the papers freely available are rubbish either.
I'm sure that this reference will be howled down as being the the work of the deniers and the left rubbish media but it reportedly uses the same data set as used by the IPCC and other "Scientists" as well as including data sets/graphs conveniently omitted from reports and presentations or adequately explained by those championing the predictions as to why the significant differences exist between predictions and actual's
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/09/04/the-pause-lengthens-yet-again/
Wobbly
It was an "on electric' operational matterwide eyed and legless said:I have wondered why the Ausgrid lease fell through, was it really because Pauline and Nick would have been voting against it? Or was it really because the reason was it was so secret the only person Scott Morrison could relay the reasons to was himself.?
RRIIIGGGHHHTTTTTTT.....OOOKKKKAAAAYYYYwobbly said:I can't personally provide the evidence you request but I can suggest that not all the papers freely available are rubbish either.
Enter your email address to join: