peas_and_corn
I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I cannot mash that
Hmm, I need to find this 'mail room' you speak of. Or just get prepaid envelopes. The club's paying for them anyway...
Surely this thing is going to sink faster than the Newton? It looks so unwieldy.
Unfortunately, it will succeed.
In a few months there'll be douchebags everywhere carrying these things around like Moses with ten commandments.
Unfortunately, it will succeed.
In a few months there'll be douchebags everywhere carrying these things around like Moses with ten commandments.
im sure there is a dumb joke to be had here. something along the lines of being large cumbersome and moody but with clever marketing like it allows you ride horses or go to the beach. if you get my drift.the iPad...
see i knew there was a joke to be had.Already been done! It has been nicknamed the iTampon.
I think this is incorrect - they used a more powerful processor just so they could enable multitasking (in the one device where I wouldn't need it so much). All the other complaints hold IMO.I think it can also only run one app at a time
The iPad is based on the same operating system as the iPhone, and they share the limitation of being unable to use multiple applications at the same time or to display web pages created using Adobe's Flash.
attachment=35286:yo_dawg_ute.jpg]
Ahhhhhahahahahhahahah that's classic!
The iphone is good and a leader in it's class because of the sheer number and range of apps available (of course, most of them are shite, but anyway) versus other smartphones, while also doubling as a entertainment/media playing device. Perfect for the "I want a smartphone but I'm not a businessperson" crowd.
When you compare the iPad to other netbooks, you'll soon see the only advantage is the touch screen. The built-in software still has loads of flaws; no flash support for starters :facepalm:, and will run iPhone applications (why bother running these on a PC capable of much more?) and iPad specific user-developed apps. The flash memory with no expansion slot is an absolute joke, especially for a device able to play dvd-quality movies.
I think I'll stop there.
Huh. Not sure where I heard that then. Perhaps it was just one of the rumours that didn't materialise.Not taking it as gospel, but it seems the iPad is limited to one app at a time.
Huh. Not sure where I heard that then. Perhaps it was just one of the rumours that didn't materialise.
Some interesting stuff here - someone's already gone through the SDK and found all the un-implemented stuff that's already coded like voice calls and camera, and suggests that multitasking will be pushed in the next update to iphone & itampon. That would be pretty sweet to get multitasking.
I think it can also only run one app at a time (plus only apps approved by Apple can be downloaded), oh and iBooks is only available in the US, so really until this is available in Oz, the iPad will basically be a large akward iPhone that doesn't make phone calls or have a camera.
Cheers SJ
I think this is incorrect - they used a more powerful processor just so they could enable multitasking (in the one device where I wouldn't need it so much). All the other complaints hold IMO.
+1apple are now a bunch of pricks, they saw what phone companies did in the past (ie multiple releases of phones each with features/upgrades' that should have some standard in the first place. Apple have given up their integrity as a company that provides best service/quality etc in the first place and now does money making stunts. like the arrogance of relasing iphone with no video capability even though they had the technology and software. and locking them from using certain apps etc unless you jailbreak them'
I dislike apple very much. and their iphone is overrated.
Enter your email address to join: