Sequence of events my friend.Liam_snorkel said:there was an election in 2010, you may remember.
So disband the Coalition?Malted said:then the disposer bought a few independents to gain a couple of votes to get into the captains chair?
So the entire voting populace agreed prior to voting, to contrive the result in order to send a message? That must have been one hell of a hall to accommodate everyone when deciding the direction of millions of votes.Malted said:the voting public then decided in the next election that they didn't have confidence in either party, so it ended up that the results showed that 50% of the voters didn't like one party and 50% of the population didn't like the other
Rudd won on the basis of the Presidential style popular campaign, and then became victim of his own creation. The 2020 summit a good example of populist agenda with no substance.Donske said:And yes, I do know that technically we vote for the parties, but 07 in particular had a real presidential feel to it, it was Johnny V Kevin, not Liberal V Labor.
Wouldn't that cause a conflict of interest with his mother in-law being the Governor General?tavas said:If Labor win the election you're getting Shorten as PM. I bet he disposes of Rudd soon after.
GG role doesn't have a fixed term but generally last 5 years, so good chance MIL would move on by then.Mattress said:Wouldn't that cause a conflict of interest with his mother in-law being the Governor General?