Blind Dog said:
given that some of the best beer I've tasted comes from breweries that use spraying, dumping from great heights or other equivalent methods to aerate wort, with nary a whiff of O2 in pure form, I'd suggest the recommended 10ppm found throughout various literature should be read in the author's context and not as a hard and fast rule that has ubiquitous application.
ive yet to taste a beer brewed with an English yeast strain where introducing O2 to the wort produced a better beer than simply shaking, or some other method that introduced air not pure O2; commercial or otherwise. Hugely subjective, limited sample size etc., but I just don't buy the add pure O2 to every beer mantra. If you want a clean ferment, yes, but some yeast strain only produce their best work when stressed.
I'm going to play Devils Advocate (again)
Accepted that some "Old" breweries didn't/don't use pure O2, but any brewery built or upgraded in the last 50 years or so probably will be (see following) but they all take steps to get as much O2 into solution as they can (as close to the ideal as they could) and for very good reasons.
As for the recommended 10ppm being an "authors" creation - Crap - its the result of years of high quality of research into how yeast works and what we want it to do in the brew.
Which raises the question of why we would aerate the wort.
It isn't really about the yeast reproducing (making more yeast), more what yeast is doing while it is reproducing. In a commercial operation (or an advanced home brew situation) it isn't hard to make and pitch enough yeast. But we still want the yeast to reproduce in the wort because it takes out of the wort some constituents that we don't want in the beer. Yeast will only metabolise what it regards as nutrients vital to reproduction until it runs out of any one of a number of them (O2 included).
We boil a wort for a bunch of reasons one of the top 4 being to reduce coagulable protein that can cause trouble later, like wise when yeast is reproducing it absorbs lipids and other fatty acids which if left in the beer would accelerate staling later, proteins/amino acids, trace minerals... there are a bunch of other processes going on that are important.
The nuts of the process being, If you have the right (well optimum) amount of dissolved oxygen, the yeast will metabolise all or most of the problematic wort components at the same time. This gives the best beer possible, that Optimum is going to be around 10ppm, this is well established by decades of research and experimentation.
Now the caveat
That 10ppm isn't a carved in stone, written by the finger of God... absolute. It is however a very close and easily achievable quantity, if you don't have a DO meter and a pretty good lab backing you up 10ppm is a better answer than you will get without a lot of technical support.
There are ways to compensate for less than ideal aeration, very low temperature pitching, or yeasts that like/behave differently mainly by varying the pitch rate, and old breweries that lacked modern aeration often took steps to compensate, like double dropping, systems like the Burton Union, pitching large active starters... in most cases these are steps required to make up for less than ideal aeration.
As for some yeast needing to be stressed, again I disagree strongly, no yeast should ever be stressed. There is a wealth of difference between varying pitch rates, levels of aeration, pitch temperature... and being stressed.
It is well understood that higher pitch rates reduces ester production, reduces the bitterness in extreme cases (over pitching has its own issues).
I cant think of any yeast that doesn't benefit ideal aeration (around 10ppm) in a healthy well made wort. the old saying "
we make wort - yeast makes beer" Good aeration isn't a magic bullet but is an important part of good brewing.
Mark