I was thinking of doing a counterflow chiller until I did some research.
A good write up is the follow link : http://www.mrmalty.com/chiller.php
Im sure the both have their good points and people will prefer different things.. but I thought the immersion chiller will be the way i go with a whirlpool attachment.
I guess it all depends on what equipment you have. Your system requires a pump. To skip the whirlpool you need a good screen. A counter flow with out a pump requires enough height of the brew kettle to get gravity flow into the fermentor.
So no pump, a good screen, and a counter flow chiller gives pitchable wort in as long as it takes to drain the kettle. That is fast enough for most people.
With a pump and no screen the coil chiller may work great. Question is if you have a pump and no screen, dont you have to worry about clogging the pump?
I also question the time results in the link you posted. Maybe if they have very cold water then they can get a fast chill to 100F. I find it takes a bit longer with my smaller chiller. The big problem comes with the drop from 100F to pitching temps. That is not a problem with a plate or counter flow chiller from any that I have seen used. The wort comes out at pitching temps and they are done before I get down to 100F.
Just pointing out the differences in each system.
The Chillzilla is one heck of a counter flow chiller. Not prone to permanent plug ups like a plate chiller and easier to clean. Not cheap though.