Blind Dog
Beer
- Joined
- 30/7/13
- Messages
- 1,714
- Reaction score
- 793
Agree the above; basically racking to secondary is usually pointless and a potential infection source. Even with big beers I'd rack to a sealed sanitised keg purged with CO2, or bottle and age in the bottle rather than rack to secondary.Bribie G said:I'm convinced that "secondary", like so many procedures in home beer brewing, is a hangover from the days when beer making was a quaint branch of winemaking circles where they would crank out a beer now and again but were still in the wine mindset. Another one is airlocks.
The old books such as CJJ Dennis insist on secondary fermentation to get the beer off the yeast cake. It was also an opportunity for brewers back then to have jargon trip off the tongue to impress others. "racking" "wort" "secondary" etc. We've moved on from there, nowadays it's "Bluetooth, VPNs, 4k Ultra HD" whatever.
Whilst racking may be an advantage in wine making to avoid musty off flavours from autolysis, there's really no point in the case of beer as you aren't normally going to have it sitting on yeast for weeks or months. It may be justified for a Baltic Porter or Russian Imperial Stout but not for daily beers.
Plus, if i had a Bluetooth i'd head to the dentist sharpish; VPN calls for an embarrassing visit to the local quack; 4k ultra HD is just a fancy name for crack (at least that's what a bloke with a beard told me)