Safale: S-04, strikes again!

Australia & New Zealand Homebrewing Forum

Help Support Australia & New Zealand Homebrewing Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I will never use 04 again. I have lost three batches to it.
Granted I know a hell of a lot more now than back then but thrice bitten. ......
 
Black Devil Dog said:
Thanks Pratty, I FWH pretty much all my beers now, I've done 60min etc, but I've settled on FWH as my default bittering. I like the mellow bittering effect it (usually) has on my beer.

I don't adjust with gypsum, actually, I don't do any water adjustments, other than Acid malt.

The beer tastes quite ok, it's just very malt forward and that's not what I was expecting.
It's possible your water was higher in chloride than normal and the malt was bought forward. You should look into the water to see the ppm for the 6main minerals. My water already has a great balance of 35ppm of sulphate and chloride which is great for my wheats and dark beers, but when it come to lighter beers and hoppy beers they need to be adjusted.
 
Yeah, not happy with S04. Windsor, M79 are better as far as dry yeasts go.

But..... it mightn't be the yeast but water.

I'd been having problems with the right bitterness and hoppiness in my beers. Got a copy of the local water profile, some brewing salts and quickly solved the problem.
 
I always had probs with S04 attenuation.

Now I pitch big, aerate and warm it up thru the ferment.

Had a RIS go from 1115 to 1030 in 3 days.
 
I use s04 a bit and really like it as a yeast, it does drop out a bit prematurely at times but a good swirl and a bump in temperature has always got it to finish the job for me.
 
Yeah have been in and out of love with s04 but at the end if the day it is a solid yeast if using in the right styles
 
I was using S04 for british beers.

But I find its profile too mellow for it. M79 does that for me - gives me a good profile to my tastes.

If I want something a bit more reliable - Notto will do it for me and quicker.

If I want something less attenuative - Windsor.
 
I brewed an Pale Ale with it the other week. It was more of an APA than anything else. Turned out pretty good. Didnt do any water adjustments, in fact I didnt use any additives at all as I have run out of brewbrite.
I normally pitch 2 or 3 packs per 36 litres, then half the yeast cake and ferment another brew on the cake.
Cheers
LB
 
What temps do people use S04 at?
In my experience, anything less than 20 is not ideal. 22 is about where you need to be.
It is a great yeast once you know how to use it. Especially for malty amber ale, brown ale or stout.
 
I brewed my Pale at about 16 deg, which is the temp in the kitchen. I havent used it for a brown ale for a while, but the last one would have been around 18 deg and didnt have any issues with it. I have gone from not liking it, to be comfortable with it, which may be more to do with improving my rig and process, more than the yeast. However, as I said before, I always pitch more than recommended, so that may be the real answer here. Doing the same with S23 atm, which is a yeast I said I would never use again, so it will be interesting to see the results.
Cheers
LB
 
I reckon that Irish Ale wyeast is a cracker for high gravity beers. Also a raft of liquids that far surpass 04 for what you are doing. Ringwood Notto !968 1028 have all been good to me.
 
Saf 04 can't be too bad a yeast as the majority of english micros either use it or notty according to jims beer kit,just drinking a beautiful dry stout i made with it now,always rehydrate and haven't had attenuation problems with it for years,great in dark beers
 
Rob.P said:
I will never use 04 again. I have lost three batches to it.
Granted I know a hell of a lot more now than back then but thrice bitten. ......
I hear that a poor tradesman blames his tools.

Or, there are no bad yeasts, just bad brewers.

Maybe it was a bad batch of S-04?
 
Les the Weizguy said:
I hear that a poor tradesman blames his tools.
Some tools require superior skills to be used effectively. Highly flocculant yeasts tend to drop out before FG if yeast health isn't great where less flocculant yeasts are more forgiving. That's why US05 is known the be more forgiving than S04.

I find that I am often quite lazy when it comes to handling dry yeast where I put more effort into liquid yeast. I 'll just chuck to dry in and expect perfect results where the liquid I'll do a few batches with the same yeast to get my moneys worth and as a consequence I'll do as "starter" of 1-2L in the fermenter 12 hours before pitching (from the cube so timing isn't an issue).

Vini2ton said:
I reckon that Irish Ale wyeast is a cracker for high gravity beers. Also a raft of liquids that far surpass 04 for what you are doing. Ringwood Notto !968 1028 have all been good to me.
so4 is the dry version of 1968 if I'm correct.
 
Vini2ton said:
Heard said that so4 is whitbread, but then again I hear a lot of things. Never used whitbread, but have used so4 and 1968.
Just did a search and you seem to be right. I don't know where I got the 1968 and S04 being the same from.
 
black_labb said:
Just did a search and you seem to be right. I don't know where I got the 1968 and S04 being the same from.
I want to get some whitbread now and see what it does. Most of those pommie yeasts just need a damn good thrashing.
 
I have always used it at 18 or less.

What esters do you get from it at 22 degrees?

Considering a brown fermented high.

Not For Horses said:
What temps do people use S04 at?
In my experience, anything less than 20 is not ideal. 22 is about where you need to be.
It is a great yeast once you know how to use it. Especially for malty amber ale, brown ale or stout.
 
I have only used this yeast for the past 8 years, I find that having now brewed in excess of 100 brews and never experienced a bad or under attenuated beer with this yeast I would ask myself if the problem is something else.
The instructions on the package does not require or recommend rehydrating. If you are doing something other than what is recommended by the manufacturer then you can only blame yourself and not the yeast.
I sometimes smile to myself when I read about the brewers who criticize a yeast and draw comparisons with other yeasts which are considered better, probably because they are more expensive and have never done a side by side comparison.
If there was a challenge to find the best overall performing yeast, SO 4 would win hands down...no affiliation !!
 
Back
Top