Katie, I see no problem with it, the Twilight series, from what I have gathered, is basically just a love story that happens to involve vampires and werewolves. In reality it's no worse than her reading the full Harry Potter series.
The Sookie Stackhouse books I would be holding off for a few more years though
As for that picture, I'm not sure if I should feel dirty or not for looking at it. How old are those two???
I assumed Twilight, like Harry Potter, was for kids - books and the movies.
Or adults who struggle to get beyond the primary school reading list?
Though he has no problem with her reading and watch DR WHO...
thats even worse. its all the grubby homebrewers that cant be bothered talking about homebrewing so we talk shite! lol.CM2 it is the non topic section.
I am allowing her to read the first two book of the series. I've never censoured what she reads to a point of cause.
Her father has a major problem with it. Calling it Chick Lit Soft Porn which is written for teenage girls and women who are able to contextualize the shallow charactersations and vapid plot devices of Twilight within their own experiences with members of the opposite sex. Just because something is immensely popular doesn't mean it has any intrinsic worth. Ponder on the fact that organised religion, human sacrifice, alcohol, tobacco, female circumcision, gladiatorial combat, pornography, infanticide etc., have all been wildly popular throughout the ages.
Though he has no problem with her reading and watch DR WHO...
Our daughter read the first of the series at 10, Katie. My wife read it first (struggled to, I will admit) to see what she was in for. She says it is nothing worse than what she would be exposed to in mainstream advertising and schoolyard conversations. I think soft porn is going a bit OTT and maybe you need to remind her father that some of his opinions are why you aren't a couple anymore...
Our daughter read the first of the series at 10, Katie. My wife read it first (struggled to, I will admit) to see what she was in for. She says it is nothing worse than what she would be exposed to in mainstream advertising and schoolyard conversations. I think soft porn is going a bit OTT and maybe you need to remind her father that some of his opinions are why you aren't a couple anymore...
im not critisising KT.I have no problem with Dr Who, she has watched it forever. Nothing also wrong with the Dr Who books but is it a high level of Literature? It has scary darlicks and monsters in it. Whats the difference between that and vampires?
And I had already made my decision on what to do I just thought it would be interesting to see what others thought and this forum being male.
im not critisising KT.
I havent seen the films or read the books, so I wouldnt know. I would have thought it was pretty soft comepared to the vampire chronicles (correct name? with Lystat? etc, the orginal Interview with the vampire stuff. that was apparently pretty adult).
suggest that she read Radical Brewing by Mosher instead. Its a 'fringe' book :blink: :lol:
They were. Actually the author published full on S&M porn novels as well under a diferent name.I havent seen the films or read the books, so I wouldnt know. I would have thought it was pretty soft comepared to the vampire chronicles (correct name? with Lystat? etc, the orginal Interview with the vampire stuff. that was apparently pretty adult).
They were. Actually the author published full on S&M porn novels as well under a diferent name.
Again... don't ask me how I know this.
At least they had proper vampires in them.
I think the real question is whether it is appropriate for ANYONE to read the twilight series. Reading then will just encourage more bad vampire fiction to be written and for the good of humanity we can't let that happen.
im not familiar enough with most of the bible to know what your referring to. Please elaborate. Im very interested.If that is true then Descartes ripped of the New Testament.
Enter your email address to join: