drtablet
Active Member
Hello,
I wanted to get a general idea from those very experienced out there.
I'm shifting from bottling to kegging, but will ultimately bottle from the keg after (not always).
I wanted to know if anyone knows any difference with having the beer mature in the keg before or after carbonation.
The way i see it I can
a) keg and let the beer mature (Room temp_RT 1 month) then force carbonate 4C for 5 days and bottle at 4C.
b) keg and force carbonate immediately (4C for 5 days) , then let it mature (RT 1 month) , then bottle it at 4C.
c) Keg and force carbonate (4C for 5 days), bottle immediately (4C) and let mature in the bottle (RT for 1 month)
The way i see it, does it really matter where you let the beer mature? Assuming that the yeast does not do any of the maturing, its a set of chemical reactions what would happen quicker at RT than 4C anyway. I have 2 weeks in the primary and secondary vessels already to allow the years to "clean-up". See below.
Below is my general brew cycle for Pale Ale.
Brew and transfer to Primary fermenter for approx 1 week until fermentation is fully finished
Transfer to secondary and dry hop for a week.
Transfer to to bulk container and bulk add dextrose and bottle.
Mature and natural condition (carbonate) in bottle for 1-2 months RT
Drink.
For the sake of argument lets call RT a steady 20C
Interested in peoples opinions, considering I will ultimately bottle in the end, my goal is to have a force carbonation in the keg and bottles without any yeast or sediment and better control the carbonation level.
Obviously bottling from carbonated kegs brings its own challenges, like having all the equipment at 4C, like tubes and bottles and such, when my garage is really 20-30C. So if anyone has any advise on bottling without foam and maintaining good carbonation and PSI flow rate from a single beer gun at a higher temperature Id' be interested to know that too.
Many thanks, would love to hear from you.
Craig
I wanted to get a general idea from those very experienced out there.
I'm shifting from bottling to kegging, but will ultimately bottle from the keg after (not always).
I wanted to know if anyone knows any difference with having the beer mature in the keg before or after carbonation.
The way i see it I can
a) keg and let the beer mature (Room temp_RT 1 month) then force carbonate 4C for 5 days and bottle at 4C.
b) keg and force carbonate immediately (4C for 5 days) , then let it mature (RT 1 month) , then bottle it at 4C.
c) Keg and force carbonate (4C for 5 days), bottle immediately (4C) and let mature in the bottle (RT for 1 month)
The way i see it, does it really matter where you let the beer mature? Assuming that the yeast does not do any of the maturing, its a set of chemical reactions what would happen quicker at RT than 4C anyway. I have 2 weeks in the primary and secondary vessels already to allow the years to "clean-up". See below.
Below is my general brew cycle for Pale Ale.
Brew and transfer to Primary fermenter for approx 1 week until fermentation is fully finished
Transfer to secondary and dry hop for a week.
Transfer to to bulk container and bulk add dextrose and bottle.
Mature and natural condition (carbonate) in bottle for 1-2 months RT
Drink.
For the sake of argument lets call RT a steady 20C
Interested in peoples opinions, considering I will ultimately bottle in the end, my goal is to have a force carbonation in the keg and bottles without any yeast or sediment and better control the carbonation level.
Obviously bottling from carbonated kegs brings its own challenges, like having all the equipment at 4C, like tubes and bottles and such, when my garage is really 20-30C. So if anyone has any advise on bottling without foam and maintaining good carbonation and PSI flow rate from a single beer gun at a higher temperature Id' be interested to know that too.
Many thanks, would love to hear from you.
Craig