Ducatiboy stu
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2/4/05
- Messages
- 14,269
- Reaction score
- 3,832
BeerFingers: I agree that we should use technology where feasible but you'd be very surprised how many systems still rely on PSTN for control. Even as late as last year I was still maintaining equipment that included a 300 baud modem! Most of your traffic warning signs and other similar devices use PSTN for control, the cost of replacing them is far too prohibitive. Even many of the new systems that have a modern comms system nearly all have PSTN fallback. Why? Because it always works.
It's the same thing with pagers, there are still thousands of remote pumps and similar who still use paging for turning them on and off. Have a look at ship telemetry, air warning systems, military radios and thousands of other systems use low baud rate and antiquated technology. Reliability is far more important than peak data rates.
BF... I hope you are able to understand what Deamon is saying....
And yes...I do understand that you are to scared to come from behind the keyboard and actually have the balls to state who and what you know....and I doubt that you would have any clue what happens in the real world...
And I will dig a hole.... as it may be usefull to bury smart ass trolls like you in...