LAGERFRENZY said:
Would you be able to analyse if one of the brewers exceeded a 20% dextrose limit. Serious question - if bragging rights are the only outcome to shoot for how can you guarantee that there is not a Lance Armstrong in the race? Sorry if its a dumb question.
So there is that point on quality again, a reoccurring theme in these healthy challenging questions.
I expect that some beers will be ripe after a year, maybe even fresher as per Yob's example. Grainer mentioned 3.
I don't know how to write a rule that imparts a requirement to brew a beer that is aimed to be a 'beer of exceptional quality'.
I kind of planned that participants would organically go for that.
So what if I put up, say, $100 prize money and sponsored this. The ingredients, time, planning, fermentor allocation, dedicated temp control, process expenses, labour, documenting... etc. involved by a participant would quickly render $100 worthless.
It is my view that the intrinsic motivation of people will make them participate. And consequently there will be an effort to produce a damn fine product.
A Lance Armstrong in this game would make a ethanol rich liquid without regard for Rule 13.