Coxy
Well-Known Member
There are a number of topics on here relating to efficiency and new brewers struggling with getting enough fermentables out of their mash, but I would like to outline my experience in working through the problems. I am not new to brewing in general, but am fairly new to AG brewing, having done only 3 partial mashes and now 3 all grain. The first two partial mashes were BIAB for the mashing part, with not horrible, but not good either, efficiency of around 60-65%. I then invested in a false bottom and a ball valve setup on my 19L cylindrical cooler (making it an MLT) with the intention of having immediate efficiency improvements over my BIAB attempts.
Much to my dismay, my efficiency for the 1 PM and first 2 AG brews was dismal, at around 50%! I believe there were a large number of issues causing my low efficiency and have since been corrected. I think many new brewers probably make exactly the same mistakes as I have, so I would like to document them on here and help everyone out a bit.
I don't think I was losing too much in the mash itself; My strike temperature has always been calculated correctly, and I mash for 60 minutes at around 65C, losing only 0.5-1 degree during the entire 60 minutes. I have done iodine tests on the last few which show no reaction to unconverted starches, also leading me to believe that there has never been a problem here.
That leaves sparging. For all previous sparges before today, I have used a batch sparging technique (today I did fly). There are a number of things that I believe that I did wrong using this technique.
Firstly, and this cannot be fixed now, my ball valve was installed about 3cm too high, meaning that the wort has to actually siphon out at the end rather than just drain out. This means that if I lose the siphon while running the batch sparge, which is very possible if the speed of the runnings is not high and air is in the hose, I leave about 1L of wort at the bottom of the MLT. There is no real way to know whether I have lost the siphon as I can't see the bottom of the tun for the grain. This is one of the main reasons I have moved to fly sparging, as the height of the valve is simply not an issue, as the water is always siting about 3cm above the grain bed so it never needs to siphon.
Secondly, everywhere I had read stated that my sparge water should be 77 degrees. This is very, very incorrect for a batch sparge, and even for a fly sparge. It is the grain bed that should be at 77 degrees after adding the sparge water and stirring it through. As I took off the first runnings, my grain bed was dropping about 10 degrees! I'm guessing this very fast loss of heat is due to the cold air being pulled through the grainbed as the water leaves through the bottom. This means that I was adding 77 degree water to a 55 degree grainbed, which was only raising the temperature back to somwhere around 70 degrees. I was running two batches after the first runnings, so the second batch was only a bit higher, at about 72 degrees. At no point was my grain bed getting up to the optimal 77-80 degree range.
Thirdly, the grind of the grain was probably a bit thick. I asked them to grind it slightly finer than they usually do and they were more than happy to do so.
Today's fly sparge - things that I managed to do well (I think):
Mashout: I did a decoction of sorts to perform a mashout. I drew off about 25% of the wort, brought it to the point of boiling (but did not boil for any length of time like a normal decoction) and then added it back into the MLT and gave it a stir. This raised the mash to 74 degrees - not quite the target of 77 but pretty close. My understanding is that performing a mashout can significantly increase efficiency, especially in a fly sparge, as it allows the malt to infuse into the water much better and the water 'rinses' the grains much better once the mash is at this temperature.
I do not have a 3 tier setup (no HLT with a ball valve to run into the MLT), so I was literally scooping water (at about 90 degrees) with a pyrex jug and onto a plastic lid which was sitting at the top of the mash (see image). John Palmer mentions this technique in the lautering section of How to Brew. Note that the water temperature was this high as it was losing quite a lot simply by spreading over the lid - at no point did the grain/wort get above 79 degrees. The lauter was running very slowly from the MLT into the kettle, so in total it took about 90 minutes.
Efficiency of today's process: 75%. That's 25 points higher than the 50% or so I was getting in the last few.
If anyone has any comments about what else may have been causing me problems to begin with or what I could do even better next time, or any questions about my process, please let me know.
Cheers,
Coxy
Much to my dismay, my efficiency for the 1 PM and first 2 AG brews was dismal, at around 50%! I believe there were a large number of issues causing my low efficiency and have since been corrected. I think many new brewers probably make exactly the same mistakes as I have, so I would like to document them on here and help everyone out a bit.
I don't think I was losing too much in the mash itself; My strike temperature has always been calculated correctly, and I mash for 60 minutes at around 65C, losing only 0.5-1 degree during the entire 60 minutes. I have done iodine tests on the last few which show no reaction to unconverted starches, also leading me to believe that there has never been a problem here.
That leaves sparging. For all previous sparges before today, I have used a batch sparging technique (today I did fly). There are a number of things that I believe that I did wrong using this technique.
Firstly, and this cannot be fixed now, my ball valve was installed about 3cm too high, meaning that the wort has to actually siphon out at the end rather than just drain out. This means that if I lose the siphon while running the batch sparge, which is very possible if the speed of the runnings is not high and air is in the hose, I leave about 1L of wort at the bottom of the MLT. There is no real way to know whether I have lost the siphon as I can't see the bottom of the tun for the grain. This is one of the main reasons I have moved to fly sparging, as the height of the valve is simply not an issue, as the water is always siting about 3cm above the grain bed so it never needs to siphon.
Secondly, everywhere I had read stated that my sparge water should be 77 degrees. This is very, very incorrect for a batch sparge, and even for a fly sparge. It is the grain bed that should be at 77 degrees after adding the sparge water and stirring it through. As I took off the first runnings, my grain bed was dropping about 10 degrees! I'm guessing this very fast loss of heat is due to the cold air being pulled through the grainbed as the water leaves through the bottom. This means that I was adding 77 degree water to a 55 degree grainbed, which was only raising the temperature back to somwhere around 70 degrees. I was running two batches after the first runnings, so the second batch was only a bit higher, at about 72 degrees. At no point was my grain bed getting up to the optimal 77-80 degree range.
Thirdly, the grind of the grain was probably a bit thick. I asked them to grind it slightly finer than they usually do and they were more than happy to do so.
Today's fly sparge - things that I managed to do well (I think):
Mashout: I did a decoction of sorts to perform a mashout. I drew off about 25% of the wort, brought it to the point of boiling (but did not boil for any length of time like a normal decoction) and then added it back into the MLT and gave it a stir. This raised the mash to 74 degrees - not quite the target of 77 but pretty close. My understanding is that performing a mashout can significantly increase efficiency, especially in a fly sparge, as it allows the malt to infuse into the water much better and the water 'rinses' the grains much better once the mash is at this temperature.
I do not have a 3 tier setup (no HLT with a ball valve to run into the MLT), so I was literally scooping water (at about 90 degrees) with a pyrex jug and onto a plastic lid which was sitting at the top of the mash (see image). John Palmer mentions this technique in the lautering section of How to Brew. Note that the water temperature was this high as it was losing quite a lot simply by spreading over the lid - at no point did the grain/wort get above 79 degrees. The lauter was running very slowly from the MLT into the kettle, so in total it took about 90 minutes.
Efficiency of today's process: 75%. That's 25 points higher than the 50% or so I was getting in the last few.
If anyone has any comments about what else may have been causing me problems to begin with or what I could do even better next time, or any questions about my process, please let me know.
Cheers,
Coxy
