LethalCorpse
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 19/2/07
- Messages
- 824
- Reaction score
- 8
Easy you lot. You're making a storm in a middy glass. It's what sounds like a throwaway statement made by a member of an advisory committee on public health, on the back of a sudden tax hike that she was stunned got through without a whimper. It's a long shot, a "hey, that was easy, let's see how far we can ride it" type thing. I'm surprised if it gets any more attention than the referenced piece in a rag like the courier mail. It's not even something that's been proposed by a member of parliament, let alone government policy or proposed legislation.
And how the hell did this become about priests? I'm more than over any mention of priests needing to be linked to sexual proclivity, let alone as a standin for all things distasteful. I've known personally at least a dozen priests, each of whom does more good in his lunch hour than most of us do in the proverbial month of Sundays. A few of them have dedicated almost all of their work to helping and protecting the children they're so quick to be written off as rampantly buggering. I've had an absolute gutful of it, and I'm an atheist. How do you reckon it makes the priests feel?
And how the hell did this become about priests? I'm more than over any mention of priests needing to be linked to sexual proclivity, let alone as a standin for all things distasteful. I've known personally at least a dozen priests, each of whom does more good in his lunch hour than most of us do in the proverbial month of Sundays. A few of them have dedicated almost all of their work to helping and protecting the children they're so quick to be written off as rampantly buggering. I've had an absolute gutful of it, and I'm an atheist. How do you reckon it makes the priests feel?