MORE of this?
One thing I hate is when one brand in a market innovates somehow and their competitors see that as a suit that has to be followed. They'll bring out a product that's a bit different and claw their way into the market, and everyone else sees this and thinks "hey, we're losing customers! We need to keep up with the times and give the people what they want" - which, oddly, is what the competitor is selling. Rather than genuinely innovate, they copy (think i-devices, 'lite', sugar free, pastel lower-case ******** packaging, bland interfaces without borders) in order to stay competitive but in reality are just flooding the market with a product that is 99% likely to be worse.
XXXX Gold, huge selling beer. Innovative in pushing a mid-strength as their flagship beer. Fair enough you shouldn't rest on your laurels but first VB Pale Ale, Tooheys Pale and now XXXX Pale Ale? A quote from the article says it all I think: “The craft beer market in Australia is starting to really take off and consumers are expecting some diverse flavours… I think that’s what we’re trying to offer with XXXX Gold Australian Pale Ale”
XXXX is not a craft manufacturer. 'Craft' has solid hipster traction and is 'trendy'. Market image aside, the smaller breweries make different good beer and that is what is gaining traction. If their marketing department honestly thinks it's the 'pale ale' facet of a beer that is making people buy them then I think they're not the type to pick up a 6-pack they haven't tried before on their way home on a Friday.
My uneducated opinion is that these products will last a few months, maybe a year or two, and won't continue to sell because
a ) XXXX / CUB / LN have already conditioned their loyal customers to their lagers and;
b ) Those who already do drink ales probably won't like it because it'll be designed to appeal to the devotees.
A heading in the article - "Aussie Favourite Innovates with New Brew". TELL ME HOW THIS IS IN ANY WAY INNOVATIVE.