manticle
Standing up for the Aussie Bottler
Not even if it's bacon?
Mmm,.....BaconLecterfan said:Especially then, because your taste receptors are all turned on by the pure sex of pig fat and become indiscriminate receivers of decadent flavours.
Wot parties? I ain't giving this stuff to the masses. :chug:danestead said:Bloody hell, your parties must be a heck of a lot of fun.
LAGERFRENZY said:Plenty of people do decent kit brews -
I still have a few kits that were stockpiled before I started AG and I do still brew them with steeped crystal malt, a kilo of LDM and about 60 - 80 grams of my favourite hop additions -
I like the beer a lot over and above the shit that Dan's tries to sell for $4 a stubby...
Yes, and I'm one of them. I must try adding crystal malt to my kits, although it's hard to improve on perfection. :blink:
jackgym said:Plenty of people do decent kit brews -
I still have a few kits that were stockpiled before I started AG and I do still brew them with steeped crystal malt, a kilo of LDM and about 60 - 80 grams of my favourite hop additions -
Yes, and I'm one of them.
I must try adding crystal malt to my kits, although it's hard to improve on perfection. :blink:
My kit beer tastes like the real beer you could buy before they started selling the watered down commercial piss of today. If people have the inability to follow simple instructions with kits and can't brew anything drinkable, then they need to turn to all grain and kid themselves that 6 hours of brewing will turn out perfection. :beerbang:Lecterfan said:My uncle in WA makes great kit beer, best kit beer I've tasted, in fact (some of Yob's came close). I drink it happily and in great amounts when I visit him. It still tastes like kit beer, though, lets not kid ourselves on that front. There is no value judgement here, however: for some, the slightest residue of the kit taste is annoying because they want total (or as much) control over their product (as they can get)... the sort of control that only AG gives. Either go AG or enjoy the excellent results that you can have within the parameters of kit beers. Four pages and no war has started. Not fussed if this post starts one. Triangle test me and most decent give-a-shit-about-process brewers who have been at it for 5 years or more and the difference will be detected. Don't kid yourself that it is just water or the stage of the moon or what you had for brekkie.
You can say that againjackgym said:My kit beer tastes like the real beer you could buy before they started selling the watered down commercial piss of today. . :beerbang:
You won't be making a 150 Lashes clone then. The recipe uses 12g of Amarillo & 25g NS. Beautiful drop.TheWiggman said:I used NS once and never will again
Have you brewed any of the newer Cooper's kits, Family Secret or Inkeepers Daughter? Using LDM and US-05 yeast produce a great beer without the need to re-hop.grott said:In general I have only tasted the "twang" when drinking weak bodied brews like Canadian Blonde where dextrose has been used as the dominant fermentable.( As previously stated I only use malt.)
Not every everybody likes heavy hopped beers and therefore if you have to change the taste of the particular style your trying to brew to remove "bad taste" then why would you.
Out of interest can you give an example of a kit brew you have done, maker, style, additives etc? Bottled/ kegged?
Cheers
Enter your email address to join: