roo rocks. really lovely as a steak and has a nice gameeyness to it. even the dried roo tails they make for dogs taste ok (yeah ok im a sick man, but the cat likes them too. thats how good they are).
emu is even gamey-ier and even tougher is cooked too much. it really has to be rare. nice though. i still prefer roo.
god i could go a nice blue steak.
more info to go towards the 'we are meant to eat meat' - our now surperflous appendix was used for digesting leaves/grass etc as primates. Evidence can be seen in herbivorous animals which has large active appendix. we dont. cause we evolved to use a better food source ie meat. we grew bigger brains and evolved becuase we started eating meat.
Hutz: Thank you, Dr. Hibbert.... I rest my case.
Judge: You rest your case?!
Hutz: What? Oh no, I thought that was just a figure of speech. Case closed.
lol, when did this thread become a discussion of the flavour of different meats? :lol:
CM2, my earlier posts discussed the physiological differences between herbivores, omnivores and carnivores. Yes we do have a vestigial caecum (appendix). But the absence of an organ like the caecum does not introduce a new function (meat eating), it simply removes an old function (grass eating). The lack of the ability to digest grass does not in any way suggest that we are metabolically required to eat meat. It simply means we cannot digest grass. And contrary to what meat eaters think, vegetarians don't just eat grass

.
If you want to support the "we are meant to eat meat" argument (and "meant" implies that it is a dietary requirement), then you need to focus on any physiological changes or functions that confer that requirement. As an example, cats are obligate carnivores. They have an absolute dietary requirement for taurine (only present in meat), due to a deficiency in the ability to synthesise this amino acid. We, however, are capable of synthesising taurine and all essential amino acids for us can be supplied in a complete vegetarian diet. And there simply aren't any nutrients that aren't able to be obtained from a vegetarian diet. Are they as easy to obtain as from meat? No and anyone who tells you otherwise doesn't know what they are talking about. But for a conscientious vegetarian they are there.
Despite their name, canines are, for us, as vestigial as our caecum. Similarly we never developed the short alimentary canal of obligate carnivores, who are "meant to eat meat". This is why I believe that there is a lot of scientific investigation into the link between meat consumption and colon cancer. Meat is simply not meant to stay in the intestines for as long as it does in humans (note that is my scientific opinion).
We are not obligate carnivores. Neither are we herbivores with a caecum. My earlier post (a few up) provides several links to scientific investigations that provide evidence that vegetarians are as healthy as those of us who eat meat, providing they know how to do it properly (and not all do). For me, those investigations remove the "requirement" of humans to eat meat and, as omnivores, simply moves the decision/debate into the realm of ethics, tradition and philosophy, not health or physiology.
Cheers
James