I wouldn't be too hasty to chastise them tangent, after all they still brew Southwark Old Stout :wub:
Double agreed! Something really tasted wrong about that beer, sour like it was infected or something. Their Pilz wasn't much better.only thing this thread proves is that beer drinkers tatse buds vary vastly between individuals.
For my 2 cents worth - Buckleys Bock is the worst beer I have ever had
Jimmy
Worst beer in Oz would have to be Little Creatures Pale Ale - tastes and smells like someone spilled perfume or flowers, or both, in there.
Worldwide, it would have to be Rochefort 10 - tastes like they ruined a dark beer with plums and raisins. I always heard the belgians made good beer, but I think we need to send over a few CUB brewers to show em how it's done
T.
Worst beer in Oz would have to be Little Creatures Pale Ale
Not sure why the Little Creatures and Rochefort 10 where nominated. Last beer tasting night my mates and I had we rated them as some of the best commercial beers.
Empire was relaunched as Pure Bland. It's still shit, and they've recently added $10 to a carton price as people started buying it because it's low carb. It used to be quite budget at $30-35, now it's $40-45.Boags St George
Blonde
Tooheys Pils
VB mid strength
Powers
Long dead now and it should remain so , Empire beer by CUB
I think this is a more subjective question Dr K. I personally don't like and wouldn't pay money for a beer like Budweiser. However, I have judged it against bjcp style guides and give it a very high score because it is pretty close to being exactly what it is supposed to be.There seems to be quite a group of drinkers out there who consider one beer or another crap,we see a beer described by one as bland and another as flavorsome..even if those flavours are reminiscent of vomit or goats piss...quite a divide of sensory evaluation of the same beer. I will restrict this to local fresh beers, just for an experiment.
Get some VB, some Fosters, some Tooheys New even some Crown or $x and do a proper blind tasting, a real assessment of the beers, use a BJCP scoresheet if you want, or do a compare and contrast.
Describe the aroma, examine the look of the beer, the carbonation, the head retention, taste it, record the mouthfeel, describe the tastes both on the palate and after, does it have a big malt character [ok give that one a miss] , does it finish dry or sweet, is there a lingering hop bitterness and on and on.
Having taken the (apparent) myriad of faults on board then write a few (or many as you wish if its that bad) lines about how you feel the beer could be improved.
THEN and only then can your criticism be taken seriously by anyone more intelligent than a parrot.
K
Boags St George, bloody terrible beer. One of the only (commercial) beers I have not been able to finish.
I think this is a more subjective question Dr K. I personally don't like and wouldn't pay money for a beer like Budweiser. However, I have judged it against bjcp style guides and give it a very high score because it is pretty close to being exactly what it is supposed to be.
I think this thread is about what people like not if a beer is technically correct. They are two very different things.
Enter your email address to join: