Tilt
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31/7/07
- Messages
- 175
- Reaction score
- 28
I've got a dilemma on my hands and am looking for opinions from those in the know.
I'm moving to the next upgrade on my 3V system and increasing brewery capacity so I can do either single (23L) or double batches.
The mashtun is sorted but I have 2 other vessels (HLT and kettle) which I need to make decisions about.
One is a good quality 70L, 4mm thick, heavy duty, sandwich construction based SS pot.
The other is a 63 L ~1mm thin, non heavy based cheapie SS pot.
Heating wise I'll use electricity for the HLT and gas plus an over the side heatstick for the kettle. At a later stage I want the option of adding a herms, but for now I'm happy with the straight 3V.
What I'm wondering is which pot to use for the HLT - and which to use for the kettle.
I had thought the heavy based pot was better for a gas fired kettle to prevent spot burning but a mate has sown the seeds of doubt with what I thought was a valid point.
He thought that spending the time effort and $$ only once on fitting elements, sightglass and temp probe/thermowell to a "HLT for life" would be a wiser choice. Doing this would leave the cheap tinny pot for the kettle
Anyone else have thoughts on this?
I'm moving to the next upgrade on my 3V system and increasing brewery capacity so I can do either single (23L) or double batches.
The mashtun is sorted but I have 2 other vessels (HLT and kettle) which I need to make decisions about.
One is a good quality 70L, 4mm thick, heavy duty, sandwich construction based SS pot.
The other is a 63 L ~1mm thin, non heavy based cheapie SS pot.
Heating wise I'll use electricity for the HLT and gas plus an over the side heatstick for the kettle. At a later stage I want the option of adding a herms, but for now I'm happy with the straight 3V.
What I'm wondering is which pot to use for the HLT - and which to use for the kettle.
I had thought the heavy based pot was better for a gas fired kettle to prevent spot burning but a mate has sown the seeds of doubt with what I thought was a valid point.
He thought that spending the time effort and $$ only once on fitting elements, sightglass and temp probe/thermowell to a "HLT for life" would be a wiser choice. Doing this would leave the cheap tinny pot for the kettle
Anyone else have thoughts on this?