Florian said:
I have once seen something that I found 'weird' which makes me a bit cautious with wort and Co2:
I had a 25L no chill cube, but only about 18L of wort, so the difference was too much to just squeeze the sides to push all the air out. I decided to just fill the cube and completely displace the head space with Co2, then pulled the lid tight.
The next morning all of the Co2 had been absorbed by the wort, there was literally no head space at all left in the wort and the cube was just a shrunken weird looking thing. I expected the walls to be pulled in a little by the cooling wort, with the volume of head space remaining the same, but instead the head space had disappeared completely.
Anyway, that's one of the reasons I wouldn't put the pressure on the reg too high, as it seems like the wort could 'eat' more Co2 than you would like too.
OK, so following up on that I filled 4 sprite bottles (acting as no chill cubes), two with water that had finished boiling one minute ago, and two with wort, again one minute after flame out.
The wort actually consisted of 2.5l of water and 220g of brown sugar, boiled for about 20 minutes with half a handful of Amarillo thrown in at the start of boil.
I filled all bottles with about 780ml of liquid, one wort and one water bottle I just closed the lid very tightly immediately (water+Air and Wort+Air), on the other two bottles I flushed the headspace for about 10 seconds each with Co2 at 80 kPa (Water+Co2 and Wort+Co2) and then closed the lid.
This is what the bottles looked like straight after filling (click on pic to supersize):
And this is what they look like about 30 hours later:
As you can see the head space in the Co2 flushed bottles is significantly smaller than in the ones with air in the head space, meaning that some of that Co2 would have been absorbed by the wort or water. Even more so when you consider that the wort+Co2 one was filled a little less originally than the wort+air one. If I had filled both to the exact level the difference would be even more visible.
Take from that what you want, all I'm saying is that the wort does seem to absorb Co2 in the cooling process. If it's a matter of 'the more Co2 you give (higher pressure setting on reg) the more it will absorb' I don't know, that would involve another fairly simple experiment (two cornies with same amount of hot water or wort and two Co bottles attached to the gas in, one with low reg setting and one with high setting. Weigh Co2 bottle before and after the cornies have cooled to determine how much Co2 has been absorbed).
I might actually do that just out of curiosity unless someone smart comes along and tells us if and why this happens.
Sorry Manticle, i hope this isn't taking your thread too far off topic, was thinking of starting a new thread but thought it sort of belonged in here. Feel free to split if off though, or even better tell me and I'll do it and add a preface to it.