So lets see if I got this right.
If something you sell (or plan to sell) hasn't got a review, some random unrelated good review (only seen 4/5 star)
is stuck in there to "hold the place"
When people start reviewing a product, if you like the review you might get around to taking down the fake review and replacing it with a real review - if its a good one. No one gets to call a piece of **** a piece of **** as that might warn people not to buy said doo doo.....
My best guess, you will be back in court some time soon, well I can hope.
Totally unethical, misleading and I hope illegal. If this is how you do business, Screw You
Mark
Like MHB said this is ********.
I submitted a review of the oxygen kit MULTIPLE TIMES on the old website that NEVER MADE IT.
https://www.kegland.com.au/pure-oxygenation-wand-kit.html
It wasn't even a bad review, all I said was that it should be sold with the flow meter in the kit.
You say set it to 10-20psi for 1min blah blah blah, low pressure can risk blocking the stone etc.
If you set it to ~15psi for 1min without a flow meter, the flow rate is WAY TOO HIGH and you end up with ridiculous bubbling.
I went through 2x O2 cylinders in 4x batches following these instructions.
Sure, you do say that the bubbles should only just break the surface, but this doesn't correspond with your other instructions for the pressure setting.
It is, in my opinion, useless without the flow meter.
My only assumption of why you didn't publish these review
(s), or haven't included this in the standard kit, is to keep the price of entry low so that users buy this and then buy the relevant tubing and flow meter later?
Why the hell would I bother reviewing products again if my first review
s for the same product didn't get published?
Cheers