DU99
Well-Known Member
Vote1 AHB party..Kev don't want the job beacuse he know's the ship sinking and he don't want to be the captain
Look at Mr Fancy-Pants and his ideals of "logic" and "reason". Since when is empirical evidence a pre-requisite for winning an argument on the internet?Dave70 said:I'd be curious to see if anybody in this small pocket of the internet can demonstrate how their own lot has been worsened by the current government.
Now, now. At least try to be fair. He did swear quite a bit too.WarmBeer said:Look at Mr Fancy-Pants and his ideals of "logic" and "reason". Since when is empirical evidence a pre-requisite for winning an argument on the internet?
it would be a novel concept but i cant see it catching on anytime soon B)WarmBeer said:Look at Mr Fancy-Pants and his ideals of "logic" and "reason". Since when is empirical evidence a pre-requisite for winning an argument on the internet?
Bah, they've got a ****-sayers lined up round the block - (or at least off the jetty) who's names are generally followed by LLB.bum said:Refugees and the like, you mean?
tee-hee
You're right.WarmBeer said:Look at Mr Fancy-Pants and his ideals of "logic" and "reason". Since when is empirical evidence a pre-requisite for winning an argument on the internet?
Never, ever read the comments. Anywhere. Internet comments are enough to make Gandhi start to stockpile anthrax to put the whole human race out of its collective misery.bum said:My god. The comments...
Anonymous commenting allowed, btw.
Still only about 75% clear on this one. Does he mean there are no circumstances or there are no circumstances.Liam_snorkel said:"Mr Rudd has said consistently over the last 12 months that he would not challenge for the Labor leadership and that he would contest the next election as a local member of Parliament at the next election. That position has not changed.
Furthermore, Mr Rudd wishes to make 100 per cent clear to all members of the parliamentary Labor Party, including his own supporters, that there are no circumstances under which he will return to the Labor Party leadership in the future."
http://www.kevinruddmp.com/2013/03/statement-from-spokesperson-for-hon.html
Considering the sentence ends with "in the future" one would think it's option 2 (No circumstances, ever).Dave70 said:Still only about 75% clear on this one. Does he mean there are no circumstances or there are no circumstances.
Pfffft, Oktoberfest silly. What do you think..sponge said:Whats happening in september?
h34r:
Gosh I really do feel silly right now.Dave70 said:Pfffft, Oktoberfest silly. What do you think..
http://www.oktoberfest.de/en/article/About+the+Oktoberfest/About+the+Oktoberfest/Dates+and+General+FAQs/751/
So, this being the internet and all,1st I'll admit that I have no children, also that I'm a non voter in general and see both L parties spouting the same ****. Just to answer any further rebuttal straight up. I am a member of at least one family though, and pretty sure Julia is too.dougsbrew said:do you think someone running a country should have experienced family life, before carrying on about what 'australian families' need?
May 2, 2007
Opposition Industrial Relations spokeswoman Julia Gillard has hit back at Liberal Senator Bill Heffernan, branding him a "man of the past'', after he accused her of being unqualified to run the country because she does not have children.
Nah. It does suggest that this whole discussion might be, though.dougsbrew said:so my point is kind of redundant.