Hilary or Donald

Australia & New Zealand Homebrewing Forum

Help Support Australia & New Zealand Homebrewing Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
wide eyed and legless said:
But is it really aimed at terrorists, has there ever been any terrorist activity from wearing the Burqa?It is airports and the ACT that the ban is aimed at, fair enough, but she wants anyone who forces a woman or a child wear a make-up and earings to be fined and imprisoned, that would lead me believe that it is about taking control away from the man.
643018-child-beauty-contest.jpg
 
wide eyed and legless said:
But is it really aimed at terrorists, has there ever been any terrorist activity from wearing the Burqa?It is airports and the ACT that the ban is aimed at, fair enough, but she wants anyone who forces a woman or a child wear a burqa to be fined and imprisoned, that would lead me believe that it is about taking control away from the man.
And that's why Bernardi has lent his support? Because he's a stalwart suffragette?

There's plenty to be discussed about human rights including religious freedoms and I'm all for that. I don't see this push as adding much, if anything to that discussion.

Plus she's from Launceston. Full muslim regalia is not something you see a lot of there. Tas is very white (some parts slowly changing a bit, particularly in my area which is nice). Still not many/any full face coverings.

Here's another take : banning full face covering in public forces those women to stay home, inside.
 
Yes but plenty of blokes that I know are not afraid to speak to women who wear traditional head dress mate!
 
good4whatAlesU said:
Men.
Men make roughly 50% of society don't they?
I wonder what the % of Men who believe in Santa is ?
 
LAGERFRENZY said:
Yes but plenty of blokes that I know are not afraid to speak to women who wear traditional head dress mate!
Excellent. But it's not exactly good or welcoming communication when you can't see the other persons face and they are not allowed out of the house without a male escort.
 
good4whatAlesU said:
Excellent. But it's not exactly good or welcoming communication when you can't see the other persons face and they are not allowed out of the house without a male escort.
Are there any jobs going as a Male Escort for these times in need as I have a mate looking for work.
 
good4whatAlesU said:
Excellent. But it's not exactly good or welcoming communication when you can't see the other persons face .
you mean like this conversation on the internet?
or when you're on the phone with someone..


it's fine if you want to claim you find it 'confronting' or 'unwelcoming' when communicating with someone wearing a full face burqa, but don't lump the rest of the population in with yourself
 
I see plenty of muslim women in Brissie out on their own or just with other women. Not a male escort within Cooee.
 
wide eyed and legless said:
Another shackle to be cast off from a man made religion which denigrates women along with female circumcision and marrying 12 year old girls.,
You're talking about the Christian religion aren't you?



1 Timothy 2:11-12 - A woman should learn in quietness and full submission. I do not permit a woman to teach or to assume authority over a man; she must be quiet.
1 Corinthians 14:33 - 35 - Women should remain silent in the churches. They are not allowed to speak, but must be in submission, as the law says. If they want to inquire about something, they should ask their own husbands at home; for it is disgraceful for a woman to speak in the church.

Ephesians 5:22 - 23 - Wives, submit yourselves to your own husbands as you do to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church
 
good4whatAlesU said:
Excellent. But it's not exactly good or welcoming communication when you can't see the other persons face and they are not allowed out of the house without a male escort.
Regardless of how you feel about the communicative nature of someone else's clothes, do you think you have the right to tell them they're not allowed to wear it?
 
Mattress said:
You're talking about the Christian religion aren't you?


1 Timothy 2:11-12 - A woman should learn in quietness and full submission. I do not permit a woman to teach or to assume authority over a man; she must be quiet.
1 Corinthians 14:33 - 35 - Women should remain silent in the churches. They are not allowed to speak, but must be in submission, as the law says. If they want to inquire about something, they should ask their own husbands at home; for it is disgraceful for a woman to speak in the church.

Ephesians 5:22 - 23 - Wives, submit yourselves to your own husbands as you do to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church
MMMAAATEEE...you do know that the Bible and its friend the Quran are a translation of a bunch of stories over a few hundred years passed down via word of mouth from several different area's..


Its almost like The Daily Telegraph for truth & honesty
 
manticle said:
Regardless of how you feel about the communicative nature of someone else's clothes, do you think you havd the right to tell them they're not allowed to wear it?
Why 'regardless"? Am I not allowed to feel more comfortable if I can see someone's face when I'm talking to them on the street?
 
SBOB said:
you mean like this conversation on the internet?
or when you're on the phone with someone..


it's fine if you want to claim you find it 'confronting' or 'unwelcoming' when communicating with someone wearing a full face burqa, but don't lump the rest of the population in with yourself
I am not trying to tell anyone else how to feel.

It is a scientifically proven phenomena that much communication occurs through seeing a persons face and gauging their body movements. It's fact not personal opinion.
 
good4whatAlesU said:
Why 'regardless"? Am I not allowed to feel more comfortable if I can see someone's face when I'm talking to them on the street?
yes, but you shouldnt be able to force them to change their clothing based on your 'feelings'
 
good4whatAlesU said:
Why 'regardless"? Am I not allowed to feel more comfortable if I can see someone's face when I'm talking to them on the street?
So 'allowed' you can force them not to wear an item of clothing?

Could I force the bogan arsehole on the Glenorchy bus not to talk about how much he wants to shoot every ****? He wasn't very welcoming or friendly.

How you feel (or would like to feel) should not be defined by law.

And you didn't answer my question anyway.
 
Back
Top