manticle
Standing up for the Aussie Bottler
Same planet as where all the honest businesses live, sifting through their perks.
And paying there fair share of Tax's in the country the where earnt inmanticle said:Same planet as where all the honest businesses live, sifting through their perks.
Umm...that is not the case with all employers... many employers really dont give a **** about Joe Average, they are just a number in a book. My experience hast told me that the bigger the employer, the less of a **** they give. They work on the principle that there are plenty of other fish who will do the same work for less.wide eyed and legless said:. Another point to remember is Bill Shortens statement to the Royal Commission about Cleanevent, 'It is better to negotiate a below award wages and no penalty rates to keep more people employed'. So that would put you behind the eight ball.
If you are happy to pay union dues stu then that is up to you, I would much sooner be judged on my merit and negotiate my own wages, believe me if you are conscientious and good at what you do then the employer will reward and look after you, if you do the wrong thing then I believe the employer has the right to sack you. And I am not saying all unions are bad just the few who keep cropping up in the corruption charges.
What the ****?Ducatiboy stu said:As for Bill negotiating a " below award wage "...would you prefer them to be on the dole or at least have work and pay some tax...
You are mistaking Award wage for Minimum wage.Lemon said:What possible reason is there for fighting for a minimum wage only to negotiate an agreement that pays less than that?
Ducatiboy stu said:
The Unions have negotiated many times for a wage reduction to keep a business afloat and keep everyone employed.Black Devil Dog said:What the ****?
Can't really believe some of the rubbish here, but this is the most nonsensical comment of all.
You're arguing in favour of something that you've spent countless hours arguing against.
There's no genuine concern for the underprivileged within the union movement, and that also applies, to a lesser extent, to the Labour and Liberal parties.
The major parties want to win the next election, the Unions generally flex their muscles and threaten strikes to try and keep themselves relevant. While they strike the 'workers' go unpaid.
All this misguided anger toward the Royal Commission, might be better directed toward the unions who are meant to be helping those who genuinely need it, rather than fleecing the members (workers).
You are correct,Ducatiboy stu said:You are mistaking Award wage for Minimum wage.
Bring back Workchoices then.Lemon said:Stu,
I agree the unions, have negotiated reduced agreements in an attempt to keep businesses afloat and people employed, but the examples, well one, I can think of is shutting the gate after the horse has bolted. E.g. Holden in Elizabeth.
The experience I have seen is the eyes open deliberate defiance of businesses trying to negotiate a true win win deal, to drive through a blind increase in wages that has resulted in redundancies and misery down the track.
I don't see a way forward with the current system.
This is unfortunately quite true.Black Devil Dog said:What the ****?
Can't really believe some of the rubbish here, but this is the most nonsensical comment of all.
You're arguing in favour of something that you've spent countless hours arguing against.
There's no genuine concern for the underprivileged within the union movement, and that also applies, to a lesser extent, to the Labour and Liberal parties.
The major parties want to win the next election, the Unions generally flex their muscles and threaten strikes to try and keep themselves relevant. While they strike the 'workers' go unpaid.
All this misguided anger toward the Royal Commission, might be better directed toward the unions who are meant to be helping those who genuinely need it, rather than fleecing the members (workers).
Just like Dyson Hayden being appointed as head of the Royal Commission.wide eyed and legless said:Australia system a lot of those who hear the complaints are ex union officials, given jobs by Rudd and Gillard. If you read some of the cases which are heard at FWA you will see that there is a lot of bias in the judgments
I agree, this is a desirable situation, the former, not the latter, but I have never seen it work.Ducatiboy stu said:Say an employer was having a downturn in their business and it becomes a financial problem that they cant trade and afford the wages,.
What would you do if the job market was extremely tight and you where staring down the barrel of unemployment with **** all work available, what would you do...take a pay cut ( which can also mean less hrs at the same rate of pay ) or go on the dole for an extended period of time ?
Enter your email address to join: