mynameisrodney
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 11/9/08
- Messages
- 363
- Reaction score
- 137
Ok, so your process involves crashing onto all the crap in the bottom of your fermenter, and then either not dry hopping or putting them in a bag, after ??? days of the beer sitting on all that **** you package, maybe you bottle? no blocked poppets that way, if the beer you produce is the beer you like then that's fine, but the OP was asking for opinions about fermenters, and I was merely trying to point out that in an ideal world process should drive the equipment, not equipment drive the process.
fwiw next brew you do (make it one you're familiar with, and not silly OG) after 5 days transfer it to another fermenter leaving all the stuff in the "bottom" behind. You might be surprised at the difference.
I either dry hop loose early and flush the headspace, or late using the bag and magnet technique. Yes crash with the trub still there. I mostly keg, but bottle probably 1 batch per year of something I want to age. I used to transfer to secondary when I started brewing as that's what everyone at the time said you had to do. The tide is shifting on that, albeit more slowly here than elsewhere. People transferring to secondary are definitely in the minority. My beers are better now than they were when I was transferring to secondary. Most likely I was introducing O2 in the process as I was just using HDPE ferementers at the time. I have no interest in going back to doing this as a matter of course. Although if there is a particular beer that needs extended secondary then will do it then.
This is a thread on fermenters though, not process. To say that you have to transfer and then store and clean twice as much equipment if you use a chubby/snubnose/all rounder is not true. Sure, this is a choice that some people will make, but it is not a requirement, and not the way that the majority of people are using these.