mr_wibble
Beer Odd
Ref: http://www.news.com.au/national/bre...t/news-story/688205b3634bebe0715e702cc7fde60d (WARNING: news.com.au link)
What this is referring to is an proposed excise law change .
Basically if beer is packaged in containers >= 48 litres there is a significantly lower tax rate. Small breweries argue, that since big breweries distribute most of their product in 50l kegs, the larger proportion of their tax is smaller. Thus the small breweries get the poo-end of the stick on excise.
Note: the article is wrong, the tax changes at 48 litres, not 30 litres.
Ref: https://www.ato.gov.au/Business/Exc...oods/Alcohol-excise/Excise-rates-for-alcohol/
The upshot is, that if your beer is packaged in bottles, growlers, or even 20 litre kegs, you pay much more tax.
Breweries that produce less than 100,000 litres/year (number from out of my memory, may be incorrect) can claim a tax rebate up to $30k. So the proposed change seems to triple that amount.
A bizarre beer tax that slugs craft brewers 40 per cent more for using smaller kegs will be axed in the federal budget.
A two-tier tax system means draught beer sold in 50 litre kegs are currently taxed at $34 a litre, but beers in kegs under 30 litres are slugged $49 a litre.
"This is unfair for smaller brewery businesses," Treasurer Scott Morrison told News Corp on Friday.
Alcohol manufacturers can currently claim a refund of 60 per cent in the excise duty paid on beer and spirits of up to $30,000 a year.
This will increase to $100,000 from July 1 next year, and apply to all brewers and distillers for the first time.
"This not only champions the craft brewers that we've all grown to love, it raises a very tantalising prospect for Australians: the likelihood of cheaper craft beer," Mr Morrison said.
"These brewers are predominantly small businesses and could benefit both from the increase to the excise refund cap and extended access to the concessional draught beer excise rate."
Opposition frontbencher Penny Wong said it was a grand idea, which the coalition pinched from her Labor colleague Anthony Albanese.
"I think it's a good idea, and it's Albo's idea," Senator Wong told the Nine Network.
What this is referring to is an proposed excise law change .
Basically if beer is packaged in containers >= 48 litres there is a significantly lower tax rate. Small breweries argue, that since big breweries distribute most of their product in 50l kegs, the larger proportion of their tax is smaller. Thus the small breweries get the poo-end of the stick on excise.
Note: the article is wrong, the tax changes at 48 litres, not 30 litres.
Ref: https://www.ato.gov.au/Business/Exc...oods/Alcohol-excise/Excise-rates-for-alcohol/
The upshot is, that if your beer is packaged in bottles, growlers, or even 20 litre kegs, you pay much more tax.
Breweries that produce less than 100,000 litres/year (number from out of my memory, may be incorrect) can claim a tax rebate up to $30k. So the proposed change seems to triple that amount.
Last edited: