Saying that Gregory Noonan's OTT and a Nitpick is a little unfair don't you think? He's got a book that's selling it's third reprint and a successful micro. I wouldn't call his advice wrong by any means. :blink:
Never said Noonan was wrong just that he is a bit full-on. You can get very good results without going to the same extent that Noonan presents. My reading of Noonan is that he is too single minded, there are many ways to skin a cat and this doesn't come across in his book. It's not surprising that he has this approach, as he is very much interested in successful comercial brewing. However as HBers we have continually shown that we can make pretty good reproductions of great styles without going to the same level as required in a commercial setting, and if on occasion we get it wrong then a corny keg of average beer is no great loss. For me some of Noonan's commercial methodologies are too intensive for how I see my hobby.
Look out John Palmer or Ray Daniels you could be next. :lol:
Don't get me started on these guys . I have made comment on Palmer in the past, in particular his recipe section and his Vienna Lager. He was kind enough to reply to forum and admitted that my comments were correct now, but at the time of his writing, there wasn't the range of malts available so he had to make adjustments.
Also lets not forget how detailed he was on mash tun chanelling. In the earlier days of this forum and Grumpys, there was loads of discusssion on making manifolds and other filtering devices. Many of us quouted his book and were obsessed with avoiding the dreaded chanelling. As it turns out on a HB level it makes bugger all difference. Look at how many of use Bazooka type screens or single lengths of braid in a rectangular esky. As a collective we found that if you batch sparge, chanelling is not a big issue and you can get away with a lot less effort than was recommended. Then there is the whole chill or no-chill question and again HBers are showing that some of the commercial practices that many of these books were based upon are not always necessary.
Don't get me wrong, Noonan, Palmer, Daniels, Papizan etc have all made huge contributions to the HB world and we have learnt a lot from them, but we have also taught ourselves a lot. I doubt that these guys would recommend that we follow all that they wrote and would admit that their books could do with a few revisions to accomodate the advances we have made in our knowledge of HBing.
Cheers
MAH