mmmmmmm.
Interesting.
I twigged right at the start of this thread who it was about. (not that hard, just look at Reg's posts, and work backwards. :lol: ). But I thought it best not to mention it, in fairness to both parties.
Glad it's resolved. I've stayed well out of it....but if I can put 2c in now.....
Q had been on the site after pm's had been sent, and after this thread went up (which was in the 'latest threads' consistantly)
R did everything he could (imo) to contact, prior to the name and shame....
However.....if Q gave a reasonable and valid reason to you for the no contact, Reg, then it's only fair that you state publicly in this thread that the reason for no contact was valid, and excuseable (sp), and that it was all an unfortunate misunderstanding. If Q has no reasonable excuse, then it is up to him to post an apology, in which case, given that the issue has been resolved satisfactorily, combined with the appropriate eating of humble pie and apology, forgiveness and understanding can be bestowed, and confidence in future transactions with Q would not, necessarily, be prejudiced. (ie, if he says "I f*cked up", and took it like a man, I (for one) wouldn't necessarily automaticaly distrust dealing with him in future...having the balls to own up to you're shortcomings buys back a considerable amount of lost goodwill.)
My 2c only....not trying to stir the pot. (well, maybe slightly, but lets face it, it could go either way...although, at this point, Q looks llike the villain...and in fairness, that might not actually be the case. B) )
