Nizmoose said:
Every time I see people struggle with getting a reliable reading it seems that going back to the old hydrometer solves the issue for most
not a shot at refractometers but I've never had any problems with a cooled sample for a hydrometer at any stage during a brew day
Got to agree with this.
Results of refractometers can be confusing at times.
For breboil gravity I chill a wort sample in a test tube and check it with the hydrometer. After getting and recording the reading I tip the sample back into the kettle and it gets boiled along with the rest of the wort.
In the time it takes for the wort to come to the boil from a 77 deg mash out I can have the sample chilled to 20 deg in the tube in the freezer.
For post boil I just check the gravity from the fermenter at pitching time. For an ale the result is pretty accurate, if it is a lager and it is chilled to lager ferment temps then it will be a point or two higher.
I dont tip the sample back onto the fermenter as this will more than likely contaminate your unfermented wort.
I take a drink of the sample, and in days gone by the boys at Grumpys said it should taste a lot like cold tea.
Depending on the hops used, it generally does.
Havent used my refractometer for about two years mainly due to the varying and at times, innacurate results.
My refractometer has joined a host of other useless brewing equipment items that I have bought over the years and which now lives in the back of a cupboard.