Not being an expert on brewing, the WW takes about 30 minutes to rinse, wash and sanitize. After this process is completed you add your wort (in my case still tinkering with K&K). Then put the lid on set temp and pressure, followed by daily monitoring. As I mentioned, I am not an expert in brewing but I fail to see how this process could introduce/leave room for infection. I stand to be corrected.doon said:The thing that puzzles me is that they are putting water into the brew after they put through clearing agent. Is this not asking for an infection? ?
I think doon was referring to the part where he flushed the clearing agent with a bottle of water and then stated that he let it run into the brew.....it would be fine if the water is sterile but not too good if it was from dubious sources.Elz said:Not being an expert on brewing, the WW takes about 30 minutes to rinse, wash and sanitize. After this process is completed you add your wort (in my case still tinkering with K&K). Then put the lid on set temp and pressure, followed by daily monitoring. As I mentioned, I am not an expert in brewing but I fail to see how this process could introduce/leave room for infection. I stand to be corrected.
And more expensivemanticle said:I wonder if he will ever consider adding a grain mashing system to the unit. That could make it pretty damn special.
Which everyday home brewers are these?Elz said:In 5 years time when either the WW or the clone equivalents are retailing for substantially less and are used by the everyday home brewer
I would say, technically, Yes.WortGames said:If it's about the brewing, well, is pushing a button on someone else's system really brewing?
Oh they can. For 5 years they can produce a slab a week of somebody else's craft brew for about $12,500. Say $15k with incidentals, sanitiser, power etc.shaunous said:On the side of the WW brewers, why couldn't they make great beer with fresh worts from CB or whoever
Enter your email address to join: