Alright what I want to know is what difference does it actually make?
Same sex relationships are already recognised. One of my former employees went through a "divorce", for want of a better word, when his same sex de facto partner left him. He lost half his assets etc. same way it would happen in a 'traditional' divorce/separation.
Being that most marriages are performed in some form of house of religion I don't think its fair to suggest that 'religion' should be kept separate from the argument when discussing marriage and being that most traditional religions aren't in favour of it then why should it be thrust upon them?
I'm all for recognition of same sex relationships - but call it something else.
As for comparing us to Russia. I'm suggesting put it into perspective. In Russia (and many other countries) gay rights ARE a human rights issue. Gay people are killed in some countries. People who even associate with gay people are killed. Here in Australia we're talking about a word and a piece of paper...