Argon, do you find you have heaps of convection still going on after 20 mins waiting? If so does it play with your whirlpool?
Thanks. :beerbang:
Hi Gibbo. My burner is 4 ring mongolian. I find that the convection currents have subsided considerably after 20 minutes. Occasionally I'll leave it up to another 10 if I still think thy're moving too much. There is a very small amount of movement when I whirlpool but it's not much.
My whirlpool gets a good rapid motion going so it actually does look like a whirlpool rather than a gentle stir. I leave this for a bit and get good trub formation which stays in the centre away from the sides.
None that I've noticed. I start the whirlpool gently around the outer edge then increase speed and bring it closer to centre. There is minor splashing but not loads and I try and minimise it. I keep the spoon straight and you can see the motion will actually pull trub to the bottom. I'm not sure if it's worth doing at all if you don't get this effect.
The method was shown to me by Fents who also brews with Kooinda so I figure he knows his stuff - certainly gives me much better cone formation than the way I used to do it.
The thing that i think is odd, is that IF you notice your beers slightly more bitter, why not lower IBU calcs by 5 IBUs??,
This has been covered before, but it's not just about the bitterness but the changed aroma or lack of aroma that is affected by nochill. And that is why people try to make changes by using a french press, or cube hopping. Sure if you don't find a difference and don't care, great. But some people do and aren't really phased by trying different things to change it.The thing that i think is odd, is that IF you notice your beers slightly more bitter, why not lower IBU calcs by 5 IBUs??, instead of going to high effort lengths to reduce them ( french pressing etc ). I don't notice a difference ( I did a 10 min APA 1.050 40 IBU and it was great ), but if i did, i'd just drop my calc'd IBU's by 5. Takes 2 seconds and no effort, instead of doing all sorts of weird and wonderful things to reduce the bitterness.
Im not saying people aren't finding no chilled beers more bitter, but i just find some of the solutions waaaaay over complicated to a simple "problem".
Every system is different, and everyone's tastebuds are different,so do what works. For me, not changing the no chill hop calc's works.
The thing that i think is odd, is that IF you notice your beers slightly more bitter, why not lower IBU calcs by 5 IBUs??, instead of going to high effort lengths to reduce them ( french pressing etc ). I don't notice a difference ( I did a 10 min APA 1.050 40 IBU and it was great ), but if i did, i'd just drop my calc'd IBU's by 5. Takes 2 seconds and no effort, instead of doing all sorts of weird and wonderful things to reduce the bitterness.
Im not saying people aren't finding no chilled beers more bitter, but i just find some of the solutions waaaaay over complicated to a simple "problem".
Every system is different, and everyone's tastebuds are different,so do what works. For me, not changing the no chill hop calc's works.
The thing that i think is odd, is that IF you notice your beers slightly more bitter, why not lower IBU calcs by 5 IBUs??, instead of going to high effort lengths to reduce them ( french pressing etc ). I don't notice a difference ( I did a 10 min APA 1.050 40 IBU and it was great ), but if i did, i'd just drop my calc'd IBU's by 5. Takes 2 seconds and no effort, instead of doing all sorts of weird and wonderful things to reduce the bitterness.
Im not saying people aren't finding no chilled beers more bitter, but i just find some of the solutions waaaaay over complicated to a simple "problem".
Every system is different, and everyone's tastebuds are different,so do what works. For me, not changing the no chill hop calc's works.
Enter your email address to join: