As I'm fairly new to brewing, with about 10 AG batches of IPA experience, I've been recording hop schedules and experimenting.
Because it's my preferred beer, I've been reading the Mitch Steele book on IPA, which is a great read by the way.
In it, he describes that FWH was an old method used during a time in Europe when they had a hop shortage. In doing FWH, you end up getting 10-15% better utilization/extraction of the hops, in part due to the longer contact with the wort, but also due to the Ph level of your wort is kept higher.
The idea with taking out 3 liters and adding all your hop additions to that during a boil is a pretty good idea.
From my understanding, a volume of wort can only take on so much isomerized hop bitterness, leaving aroma and flavour more pronounced in that smaller batch. (There's a formula in the book, I won't bore you with that LOL)
I have to say, Lord Raja's idea is fantastic!
I'll measure mine next time I brew up a batch and try that out :icon_cheers:
By adding it at less than 85C you'd get no isomerization, which would in theory only add aroma/flavour.
As far as dry hopping goes, Mitch mentions that the majority of the extraction of flavours and aromas are achieved within only a few days. Any more than 2 weeks would add grassy, stick notes to the beer rather than the fruity citrus flavours we all strive for.
Also worth noting, hopping prior to fermentation, you'll loose IBU's to the yeast. In the book, Mitch instructs that dry hopping should only be done after fermentation has finished, so I do this when I've racked to secondary. This also allows me to save my yeast cake to wash it
Cheers
Martin
EDIT: Just confirming that I no-chill, but I am looking to use a CFC soon... I'll see how Raja's idea goes first though!