manticle
Standing up for the Aussie Bottler
You'd rather have no defence forces and just let anyone waltz in and take our **** when they want it?
I don't think that's fair nor the point booary was making. The equivalent point with welfare would be 'you'd rather no welfare and people dying on the streets of typhoid and starvation?' if someone complained about the cost to the taxpayer .
I believe the point booargy was making is that tax money goes to a lot of things that the taxpayer may not agree with. Buying submarines for billions of dollars that don't work might be one of those*
People spend a lot of time whinging about where their tax dollars go (or where the Herald Sun tells them they go) without ever realising that all their tax goes wherever someone else decides it should go. Citizens have very little say and I bet my 3V system in progress that if we abolished welfare, said citizens would see very little decrease in their tax. There'd be another thing to spend it on.
*Fictitious example based on a memory of a defence acquisition read about in the paper where said equipment cost a lot and was essentially useless. I know such things have happened and can research the details if absolutely necessary.