Benn said:
"0-50deg temperature calibration," what's the go with that? Does that mean it'll be shithouse for measuring mash Ph or what?
I've got an awful feeling this reply might be duplicated, like the original one last night. Dunno WTF's going on with my pc/the forum software???
Anyway - I have the next model up, I think (the 98128) which also has those temp limits. But by the time I take a small sample from the mash tun and get the meter ready, the sample's cooled down to below 50C anyway, so it's not an issue. The 98128 also displays the temperature of the sample which is nice.
The resolution
(and accuracy) of the 98108 is 0.1 which will get you where you need to be. The 98128 resolution is 0.01
(but accuracy is 0.05) which is better, but not really necessary for our purposes.
EDITS IN ITALICS - The 98128 features auto calibration (makes it quick and easy), but the 98108 has manual calibration, so could be more of a fiddle.
Even though I normally read product manuals (yeah - weird, I know), this 'cloth junction' is a newie to me. The 98128 has a replaceable electrode, which apparently also has this 'cloth junction' feature, so I'd better re-read the manual.
Bottom line? The 98108 will be better than using pH strips, but don't forget to factor in some calibration solutions (bottles or sachets) and storage solution.