I've been using BeerSmith (v1) for a while now, and it does everything I need it to, but in a simple and easy to view/edit/use way, most especially it displays ALL the recipe and all the info in 1 nice little screen (grainbill, yeast, fermentation temps, notes etc).
But I thought I'd give BeerSmith (v2) a trial - and so far I totally hate the layout, and while its obviously much more complex, I'm not sure what has been added that is actually useful.
However, I know lots of people have purchased it so I'd like to know what everyone thinks is so good about it ... and especially why is it better than v1?
I hate how it spreads individual brew-information is spread over 5 tabs*, I can't see my 'notes' on the first page and adding 'Selected Fields' gets cumbersome** when you have more than a few bits of info you want to see.
The 'Yeast starter' tap could be cool, but despite its overly complex setup, does not allow the use of washed slurry***, stepped starters, a different pitching rate for different types of ales**** or simply a 'starter cell densiity'*****.
The mash/fermentation graphs look pretty, but don't really do anything useful.
The cost information might be useful, but I can't see it as something I want to know or care about.
... what else have I missed that should make me interested in this new version, or am I just grumpy and like simple and old-fashioned software?
*This might be different if you print stuff rather than just use it on your computer like I do.
** I've got about 14 things there - mostly what BS1 would display on 1 page - but it only puts them all in a column down the page.
*** 'Yeast starter options' has a bit about slurry but on the 'Design' or 'Yeast Starter' tabs there is no way (that I could find) to select that you're using slurry.
**** Using x0.5 for English ales for example ... unless you change the generic rate.
***** I don't mean growth factor, I mean cell density in the starter eg: '100billion cells/ml'.
But I thought I'd give BeerSmith (v2) a trial - and so far I totally hate the layout, and while its obviously much more complex, I'm not sure what has been added that is actually useful.
However, I know lots of people have purchased it so I'd like to know what everyone thinks is so good about it ... and especially why is it better than v1?
I hate how it spreads individual brew-information is spread over 5 tabs*, I can't see my 'notes' on the first page and adding 'Selected Fields' gets cumbersome** when you have more than a few bits of info you want to see.
The 'Yeast starter' tap could be cool, but despite its overly complex setup, does not allow the use of washed slurry***, stepped starters, a different pitching rate for different types of ales**** or simply a 'starter cell densiity'*****.
The mash/fermentation graphs look pretty, but don't really do anything useful.
The cost information might be useful, but I can't see it as something I want to know or care about.
... what else have I missed that should make me interested in this new version, or am I just grumpy and like simple and old-fashioned software?
*This might be different if you print stuff rather than just use it on your computer like I do.
** I've got about 14 things there - mostly what BS1 would display on 1 page - but it only puts them all in a column down the page.
*** 'Yeast starter options' has a bit about slurry but on the 'Design' or 'Yeast Starter' tabs there is no way (that I could find) to select that you're using slurry.
**** Using x0.5 for English ales for example ... unless you change the generic rate.
***** I don't mean growth factor, I mean cell density in the starter eg: '100billion cells/ml'.