Trent
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 16/6/04
- Messages
- 1,258
- Reaction score
- 2
Gday All
Just thought I may go out on a limb here, and start me a thread on the similarities/differences between Wyeast 3068 (weihenstephan wheat yeast) and the new saf dried wheat yeast, that is available through MHB, Ross, and sereral other quite reputable HBS's, I am quite sure.
This whole idea wasnt even my own (nor really anybody's), I dropped in to see MHB when I got back from the states, with the intention of getting enough supplies to make a 46L batch of hefeweizen to put into 2 kegs for me and my mates to mow through on grand final weekend. Mark suggested I use the dried wheat yeast, but I told him I already had some 3068 slurry ready to pitch. Long story short, he gave me the sachet of dried yeast, and asked me to put aside a few litres of the wort and use the dried yeast. I decide to treat his genorosity as best I could, so, I went one step better, and split the wort in half, and pitched one with the dried yeast (cant remember the number) and one with the slurry of 3068.
The recipe was simple enough
5.2kg pale malt (bit of a mix between ale malt, and some leftover pils malt)
5.2kg malted wheat
Mashed at 68C for one hour
13 IBU from EKG
OG 1054
The worts were separated into 2 fermenters after the chiller, both were aerarted for just over 1m with pure O2 at 1L/min through a 0.5 micron diffusion stone.
The experiment isnt without its fault, as the saf yeast was fermented in a 30L pail, and the 3068 in a 60L drum fermenter, hence reducing the height to width ratio of the 3068. I have NO idea what difference this will make in the grand scheme of things.
The saf wort (lets call is beer #1) was pitched at 17C with one full sachet rehydrated in water.
The 3068 (beer #2) was pitched at 18C with approx 130 billion yeast cells (about 65mL of fairly clean slurry).
Both were fermented at ambient temp in my laundry.
By day 5, I took a gravity sample. Neither of the beers experienced the crazy foam out the top of the fermenter as usually expected with a German Wheat yeast, only had the kind of krausen I get on an average beer.
Beer #1 - 1018 at 18C. Clovey and an almost pineapple aroma. No detectable banana. A clovey flavour, with some pear in the aftertaste (strangely enough)
Beer #2 - 1018 at 20C. Banana and pear in the aroma, no real detectable clove, and a very bland flavour, hardly anything detectable. I do tend to get this with alot of my beers halfway through ferment though, and by the end there is heaps of flavour.
These temps were pretty much the peak fermentation temps for both beers.
Day 9 I checked the 3068, and there was plenty of banana.
Now we are up to day 11 in primary, and I am about to rack them to kegs and bottles.
Beer #1 - 1009 - Moderate clovey flavour, no detectable banana, definite wheat breadiness. IMO, not as much my cup of tea as the banana-ey flavours typical of my weizens.
Beer #2 - 1012 - low clove flavour, moderate banana flavour, some low breadiness, and some hot alcohol (dunno why). Banana seems to have backed off in the last 2 or 3 days.
I will be delivering a few bottles to some of the Newy people in the next 2 weeks or so, and getting them also to comment on their views on the 2 different tastes. Obviously Les the Weizguy and MHB will be at the forefront. Be interesting to try both beers after they have conditioned.
My first impressions are the 3068 hasnt lived up to the way it usually behaves in my brewery, but it is still fairly nice. The dried yeast certainly seems to be a very nice wheat yeast, though didnt give me the banana I was after. Of course, fermenting at a higher temp could alter that drastically. I dont usually go for dried yeasts, but this one seems to hold its own, I will report back more after trying the beers conditioned.
Oh, and just as a disclaimer - THIS EXPERIMENT IS OBVIOUSLY VERY SUBJECTIVE, AND NOT MEANT TO BE DEFINITIVE!!!! IT WAS NOT PERFORMED UNDER STRICTLY CONTROLLED CONDITIONS!!!! I just thought that people may find the comparison interesting, and informative.
I dont really want this becoming a debate on the benefits of liquid or dried yeasts, so if you feel you need to add to this thread, then please just keep it to your experience with the 2 yeasts.
You'll be hearing back in a few weeks from me and maybe a few others (should be a few weeks, considering weizens arent at their optimum for too long :lol: )
All the best
Trent
Just thought I may go out on a limb here, and start me a thread on the similarities/differences between Wyeast 3068 (weihenstephan wheat yeast) and the new saf dried wheat yeast, that is available through MHB, Ross, and sereral other quite reputable HBS's, I am quite sure.
This whole idea wasnt even my own (nor really anybody's), I dropped in to see MHB when I got back from the states, with the intention of getting enough supplies to make a 46L batch of hefeweizen to put into 2 kegs for me and my mates to mow through on grand final weekend. Mark suggested I use the dried wheat yeast, but I told him I already had some 3068 slurry ready to pitch. Long story short, he gave me the sachet of dried yeast, and asked me to put aside a few litres of the wort and use the dried yeast. I decide to treat his genorosity as best I could, so, I went one step better, and split the wort in half, and pitched one with the dried yeast (cant remember the number) and one with the slurry of 3068.
The recipe was simple enough
5.2kg pale malt (bit of a mix between ale malt, and some leftover pils malt)
5.2kg malted wheat
Mashed at 68C for one hour
13 IBU from EKG
OG 1054
The worts were separated into 2 fermenters after the chiller, both were aerarted for just over 1m with pure O2 at 1L/min through a 0.5 micron diffusion stone.
The experiment isnt without its fault, as the saf yeast was fermented in a 30L pail, and the 3068 in a 60L drum fermenter, hence reducing the height to width ratio of the 3068. I have NO idea what difference this will make in the grand scheme of things.
The saf wort (lets call is beer #1) was pitched at 17C with one full sachet rehydrated in water.
The 3068 (beer #2) was pitched at 18C with approx 130 billion yeast cells (about 65mL of fairly clean slurry).
Both were fermented at ambient temp in my laundry.
By day 5, I took a gravity sample. Neither of the beers experienced the crazy foam out the top of the fermenter as usually expected with a German Wheat yeast, only had the kind of krausen I get on an average beer.
Beer #1 - 1018 at 18C. Clovey and an almost pineapple aroma. No detectable banana. A clovey flavour, with some pear in the aftertaste (strangely enough)
Beer #2 - 1018 at 20C. Banana and pear in the aroma, no real detectable clove, and a very bland flavour, hardly anything detectable. I do tend to get this with alot of my beers halfway through ferment though, and by the end there is heaps of flavour.
These temps were pretty much the peak fermentation temps for both beers.
Day 9 I checked the 3068, and there was plenty of banana.
Now we are up to day 11 in primary, and I am about to rack them to kegs and bottles.
Beer #1 - 1009 - Moderate clovey flavour, no detectable banana, definite wheat breadiness. IMO, not as much my cup of tea as the banana-ey flavours typical of my weizens.
Beer #2 - 1012 - low clove flavour, moderate banana flavour, some low breadiness, and some hot alcohol (dunno why). Banana seems to have backed off in the last 2 or 3 days.
I will be delivering a few bottles to some of the Newy people in the next 2 weeks or so, and getting them also to comment on their views on the 2 different tastes. Obviously Les the Weizguy and MHB will be at the forefront. Be interesting to try both beers after they have conditioned.
My first impressions are the 3068 hasnt lived up to the way it usually behaves in my brewery, but it is still fairly nice. The dried yeast certainly seems to be a very nice wheat yeast, though didnt give me the banana I was after. Of course, fermenting at a higher temp could alter that drastically. I dont usually go for dried yeasts, but this one seems to hold its own, I will report back more after trying the beers conditioned.
Oh, and just as a disclaimer - THIS EXPERIMENT IS OBVIOUSLY VERY SUBJECTIVE, AND NOT MEANT TO BE DEFINITIVE!!!! IT WAS NOT PERFORMED UNDER STRICTLY CONTROLLED CONDITIONS!!!! I just thought that people may find the comparison interesting, and informative.
I dont really want this becoming a debate on the benefits of liquid or dried yeasts, so if you feel you need to add to this thread, then please just keep it to your experience with the 2 yeasts.
You'll be hearing back in a few weeks from me and maybe a few others (should be a few weeks, considering weizens arent at their optimum for too long :lol: )
All the best
Trent