Toper
Well-Known Member
clarification accepted
I very much doubt that homebrewers can produce sterile wort or anything close. Your brew room will have a thriving population of yeast, no matter how well you clean it. Every time you open your fermenter yeast will be getting in. Even boiling for an hour isn't guaranteed to kill all micro-organisms, that is what autoclaves are for. Brewing/fermenting is not meant to be a sterile process, but good practice will ensure that infections have little chance of getting hold.Ironsides said:Wort is (hopefully) sterile so you would need to introduce a source of wild yeast.
I've just been doing the same thing except using sample tubes of wort from brew days to 'catch' some wild yeast by leaving them sitting around uncovered. They usually start fermenting 'by themselves' in a couple of days. I saved a small sample of wort from the current batch in the FV, pitched some of this yeast into it, let it ferment out and then bottled a couple of bottles. I haven't tasted them yet though. Will be an interesting comparison to the rest of the batch done with proper brewing yeast.Ironsides said:I once attempted to cultivate some wild yeast from Chardonnay juice (which I allowed to ferment out, then washed the resulting yeast and pitched into a simple ale recipe). During fermentation it tasted pretty good, but then became gradually more and more sour.
Not the paper itself but a set of powerpoint slides by the paper's author about her findings. http://www.bcwgc.org/sites/default/files/media/files/Jessica%20Lange%20UBC%20yeast%20populations.pdfmanticle said:I had hoped to read the actual study rather than a short paragraph on it...
That may be in part because the byproducts of yeast-driven fermentation considered palatable in wine are often different than what we consider palatable in beer. Acetone? Sure, works in a lot of wild-ferment wines, just coming off as fruity, but totally foul in most beer. Depends on what your palate is used to.Back Yard Brewer said:What gets me is how winery's sometimes promote a wild yeast taking hold and really I can't pick it.
Coopers moved to Regency Park in the early 2000's ,there's no way they'd be using wild yeast fermentation then.If by "wild yeast fermentation" ,you mean just leaving the fermenter open to the environment and letting nature take it's course,this hasn't happened for many,many years,certainly before early 20th century at the latest for major brewers,and Coopers were/are in that catagory.And didn't they move from Leabrook?Gusk said:Someone might be able to elaborate on this story, but when Coopers moved from Glenside to Regency Park in Adelaide they lost brews and had a quite a bit of head scratching because the wild yeast in that area was different to where they'd been brewing for 100 years or so. There is also a story about a brewery in Oakbank from many, many years (80-100) ago that had to close because the wild yeast got in and ruined everything. You can visit its remains and read the story today.
That's an interesting project.Rocker1986 said:I've just been doing the same thing except using sample tubes of wort from brew days to 'catch' some wild yeast by leaving them sitting around uncovered. They usually start fermenting 'by themselves' in a couple of days. I saved a small sample of wort from the current batch in the FV, pitched some of this yeast into it, let it ferment out and then bottled a couple of bottles. I haven't tasted them yet though. Will be an interesting comparison to the rest of the batch done with proper brewing yeast.
Enter your email address to join: