Hi PatPistolPatch said:Hey there fellas :icon_cheers: ,
Received a heads up on this thread yesterday and have enjoyed the read. Thanks very much for remembering me. I do really appreciate it and wish that teleporting was the go so as I could drop in and have a beer with a few of you that have posted here but I haven't seen for ages since moving states etc. Still looking forward to another QLD Swap and, hopefully one day, the Sydney Pub Crawl.
Regarding the question asked in this thread, I think a few of the original 'BIAB' threads/posts have already been posted. This one was meant to be continually updated to give the right people the right credit but around that time, the ability to edit posts was discontinued. Many people helped or contributed to BIAB. James Squire asked the right question for a start. Ross told me the material to get. AndrewQLD did a full volume mash on his traditional equipment. This encouraged me to do a few single vessel tests. hashie and jimmysuperlative read and advised me on a lot of material I initially wrote and they still help me now. mimeryberg was another really helpful brewer and he's from Germany if I remember rightly. Screwtop did come up with the BIAB name and many others were super helpful or valuable.
There's probably a few myths that need dispelling in this "history" thread. The first myth is that everyone was against BIAB, especially three-vessel brewers. That isn't true at all. Almost all of the original encouragement and investigation of BIAB came from existing three-vessel brewers. In those days the culture here was open-minded and investigative which was great. A year or so later the culture changed a bit and went through some quite wild stages but very few members here with any credibility made any attempts to discourage BIAB. Some of those people though did cost the whole site a lot of time and trouble, so much so, that I think quite a few people gave up on the site. I personally haven't even read here for a very long time. I am really pleased to see that this thread has 79 posts all of which are constructive, positive or humourous. I honestly thought those days were over. Very nice to see :icon_cheers:.
The next problem in this thread probably is a terminology one. As alluded to here already, BIAB, to us here on AHB at least, was more about single vessel, full-volume mashing than brewing in a bag. Was David Line's stuff focused on that? I'd love to know more on this - seriously. From the posts above, it sounds like, some of it at least, was.
What I've been working on...
I know some of you guys wanted an old-style PP essay. Who am I not to oblige?
Pretty much all of the the work I have been doing over the last few years on BIABrewer.info has been spent on the most basic building blocks of brewing. I never envisioned how hard this would be or how long it would take.
...
Apologies. I did actually have a whole essay written just above on terminology, software, formulas and people and just lost the whole lot. You might be able to imagine how I'm feeling about losing that. (Sorry stux, you had a mention there.)
...
Anyway, thanks once again for the thinking of me,
Pat
PistolPatch said:Hey there fellas :icon_cheers: ,
....
Anyway, thanks once again for the thinking of me,
Pat
The Dave line book I have is “Brewing Beers Like Those You Buy” not The Big Book Of Brewing that he wrote earlier so I don’t know what he used in Big Book Of Brewing.Yob said:Ive got the Big Book of Brewing at home, I'll grab it tonight and scan a couple of the relevant pages. From memory it like a Birko setup or some such...
regardless, cudos on all the experimentation and refinement is certainly due to yourself and those you also mention..
:icon_cheers:
Yep. I was going to post a pic of this years ago when I read a Bucket o Death thread but decided it wasn’t worth the headache of replying to all that were so against the idea. It’s just like a large electric kettle with a tap instead of a pouring spout (and an adjustable thermostat).Ducatiboy stu said:Mmmmmm..Bucket of Death
Lol! Thanks Biz. I should have left that post for Monday I think. Had already written a lot on Sunday and by the time I got to here had rewarded myself with a few beers. Lucky I lost half the post - interesting stuff for me but probably would have bored the hell out of everyone else :blink:.Bizier said:Cheers Pat, you are always welcome. Post was a little short though.
I think your getting bogged down with the "who invented BIAB" question, it's been agreed by just about everyone posting here that Australia didn't invent mashing using a bag.S.E said:Yes Pat that is correct, some sort of sparge was always recommended. I either pulled the bag out of the Electrim Bin hung it over my fermenter and drained the wort through the grain, set the thermostat and heated the sparge water in the Electrim. Or Just lifted the grain bag above the Electrim and sparged with water heated in a saucepan. So technically I suppose it wasn’t a single vessel system as a separate fermenter or saucepane was needed.
With your system did you mash at full volume then remove the grain bag and proceed to boil without sparging or recirculating?
Cheers Sean
A fair bit of testing went into looking at efficiencies with the method including the effects of full volume mashing on final wort as opposed to sparging, mash ph at full volume, crush size and efficiency ect.
From memory Dave Line used the bag more as a straining device and sparged as well.
The BIAB method that Pistol Patch and many others worked on was for a full volume mash with no sparging required and the main idea was to be able to use only one vessel for the whole process rather than having multiple vessels to do the job.
I’m not getting bogged down with the "who invented BIAB" question at all though it hasn’t been established that Australia didn't invent mashing using a bag, no one posting so far knows where it was first used. It may well have been Australia.AndrewQLD said:I think your getting bogged down with the "who invented BIAB" question, it's been agreed by just about everyone posting here that Australia didn't invent mashing using a bag.
I am pretty sure this post here answered your question above.
I don't think S.E is getting bogged down. More like contributing some pretty useful info relating to this thread.dagryll said:I've read elsewhere that BIAB was invented in Australia. Does anyone know its origins? How long ago did you first hear about it? I'm thinking it probably developed out of the Bew-In-A-Dustbin method, but wondering if any old-timers out there have any info on this.
Simplicity I think. And I think that's where Pat's contribution is being lauded in this instance - because he bothered to do the prototyping and research to convert an older English method into a newer, more measurable method, that fits the 'single vessel' mould. The no-sparge thing is (and I'm not a no-sparger) is designed to minimise time and effort and the bottleneck where a stuff up could occur.S.E said:I am having trouble getting my head around what the advantage of not sparging is though.
Cheers Sean
Thanks for your reply Sean. I think this is the real key and is the point that Andrew was hoping to highlight.S.E said:Yes Pat that is correct, some sort of sparge was always recommended.
Being able to remove two 'hard' vessels and one, sometimes two, heat sources as well as a pump or two gravity tiers is a major convenience of course. I think however you might be thinking that there is some sort of disadvantage in not doing an active sparge. One thing that many people believe is that not doing an active sparge will somehow lower your kettle efficiency. It doesn't. On simultaneous side by sides i identical kettles we have found no difference. Assuming time, temp, pH etc are the same, the key to kettle efficiency is actually how much water comes into contact with the grain rather than when it comes into contact.S.E said:As far as I can see the only difference is the no sparge. I am having trouble getting my head around what the advantage of not sparging is though.
Sounds like a haven for nazi war criminals trying to replicate das nectar of das Fatherland!Lecterfan said:AHB was always the bastion of (seemingly) knowledgeable all grain brewers who were talking all kinds of craziness about 'salts' and 'pH' and sprinkling German words throughout their posts.
Enter your email address to join: