It's always a dangerous thing .... but I've been thinking.
Should we be paying GST on ingredients? In many cases there is no need to but it is up to your LHBS!
I was looking at the ATO website (I've got a sad life) and found some interesting facts. Take dextrose for
example. If the manufacturer or wholesaler sells a 250kg bag of dextrose to your LHBS and it is just labelled
ABC Ingredients Pty Ltd
26 ABC St
West Dandenong 3164
DEXTROSE
the supply will be GST free. (See this link and refer Issue No 24 Example 23)
This is because dextrose is classified as a "food" under the GST Act. Now comes the tricky bit. If the LHBS
repackages the dextrose into 1kg bags and labels it "Dextrose" the supply is still GST free. But if the LHBS
labels it in any way that suggests it is for brewing eg "Brew Enhancer" or simply puts it in a beginner's kit
with a hydrometer and fermenter it is a taxable supply and GST applies.
A quote from this ATO site
NOTE: Where a product such as sugar is sold separately and not identified as an ingredient
for making alcoholic home brew, it is GST-free. For instance, if a supplier sells sugar that is
labelled as sugar and not differentiated as 'brewer's sugar', this supply is GST-free.
So what about grain, malt extract, yeast, hops etc?
As long as grain has been modified (eg malted) and not labelled as "Beer Grain" or "Pilsener Malt" but
simply as "Pale" or "Crystal" malt, no GST is payable. Malt extract is treated the same way.
If yeast is specified as a brewing yeast (even just a photo of a glass of beer on the package), GST is payable.
But because yeast can be used to make bread, if there is no "brew related" packaging the supply should be
GST free.
The supplier is under no obligation to find out what you want the ingredient for. If all packaging is generic,
and there is a 'food' or 'beverage' use for the ingredient, then GST need not apply.
I'm no accountant but it seems to me that an enterprising supplier could help the brewing community to the
tune of one eleventh of the cost of many ingredients by being careful with packaging.
What do you reckon?
Cheers,
Phil
Should we be paying GST on ingredients? In many cases there is no need to but it is up to your LHBS!
I was looking at the ATO website (I've got a sad life) and found some interesting facts. Take dextrose for
example. If the manufacturer or wholesaler sells a 250kg bag of dextrose to your LHBS and it is just labelled
ABC Ingredients Pty Ltd
26 ABC St
West Dandenong 3164
DEXTROSE
the supply will be GST free. (See this link and refer Issue No 24 Example 23)
This is because dextrose is classified as a "food" under the GST Act. Now comes the tricky bit. If the LHBS
repackages the dextrose into 1kg bags and labels it "Dextrose" the supply is still GST free. But if the LHBS
labels it in any way that suggests it is for brewing eg "Brew Enhancer" or simply puts it in a beginner's kit
with a hydrometer and fermenter it is a taxable supply and GST applies.
A quote from this ATO site
NOTE: Where a product such as sugar is sold separately and not identified as an ingredient
for making alcoholic home brew, it is GST-free. For instance, if a supplier sells sugar that is
labelled as sugar and not differentiated as 'brewer's sugar', this supply is GST-free.
So what about grain, malt extract, yeast, hops etc?
As long as grain has been modified (eg malted) and not labelled as "Beer Grain" or "Pilsener Malt" but
simply as "Pale" or "Crystal" malt, no GST is payable. Malt extract is treated the same way.
If yeast is specified as a brewing yeast (even just a photo of a glass of beer on the package), GST is payable.
But because yeast can be used to make bread, if there is no "brew related" packaging the supply should be
GST free.
The supplier is under no obligation to find out what you want the ingredient for. If all packaging is generic,
and there is a 'food' or 'beverage' use for the ingredient, then GST need not apply.
I'm no accountant but it seems to me that an enterprising supplier could help the brewing community to the
tune of one eleventh of the cost of many ingredients by being careful with packaging.
What do you reckon?
Cheers,
Phil