[SIZE=medium]It’s disappointing that the mash steps are manual, rather than programmable. How much would a better controller have added to the cost of this unit? For me, I would prefer to have a better controller and to leave the CFC as an optional extra. [/SIZE][SIZE=medium]A programmable mash schedule would have brought the Grainfather much closer to the Braumeister in terms of functionality, while still being half the price.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Just thinking out loud, so shoot me down if I am wrong:[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]GF seems to flow downwards through the malt pipe, whereas the BM flows upwards. Would this make the BM less susceptible to stuck mashes?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]GF appears to have a concealed element. This makes it easier to clean, but anecdotal reports on this site seem to indicate that concealed elements may be more prone to burning out, since the heat is not stripped from them as efficiently. I’m sure that for every burnt out element there’s someone who has brewed hundreds of batches without problems………[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]I have considered a similar system as a recirculating upgrade to my humble Birko urn. One concern which has stopped me is that by pumping into the malt pipe at the top and drawing wort off the bottom, will there be an annulus of water around the malt pipe which isn’t recirculating, and so is not participating in the mash?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]The lift, twist, lock design of the malt pipe is pretty cool.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]The GF facebook page recommends a lower liquid to grain ratio than the BM, so a sparge is necessary whereas the BM seems to treat a sparge as optional. The GF element only uses 500W during the mash, so it may be possible to run a small urn on the same circuit for sparge water.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]The manual temperature steps are still a stumbling block for me, but I hope they turn out to be an excellent and popular machine.[/SIZE]