Sorry, BB, but thats utter rubbish. It comes down to balance. Sweetness is balanced by one of, or a combination of, two things; bitterness, and dryness (or roast/astringency). One is imparted by hops, and the other by.....specialty grains. Grains that give a roast element. You can use quite a lot of sweeter grain, if it is balanced with a combination of hopping and roast grain. Give me a beer thats sweet on the start of the palate, mellowing to a base malt and hop flavour, and then finishing on a dry note that washes the sweetness away.....Noice.
There is a limit, obviously, but to say that 100g/23L batch is the max you can go is complete and utter madness imo.
I'll second that, Butters. (Surprise, surprise...
![Big Grin :D :D]()
)
I've not been steeping grains all that long, but the few different brews I've cracked so far, while they've had a fairly strong roasty, chunky, this-was-once-malted-barley goodness, have not been overly sweet at all. I do plan on toning that down a bit, but from over 300g of grain (which is fairly common, unless I'm mistaken), I think 200g could be in the ballpark, but 100g I probably wouldn't be bothering with. It maybe the case with particular types of grains that for sure, 100g is a limit, I'm thinking
cara roasts here, but they won't be sweeter anyway, at least I'd have thought.
Obviously, its difficult and risky to generalise like that. The ESBs and stouts (in particular) I've modelled my recent brews upon seem to take additions of that order in their stride, whereas other styles, well, I'll leave that to the experts.
Balance, of course, is what we're all after, at least most of us would be, remembering of course that a lot of this is often based on a subjective assessment (i.e. we don't measure much/all of this directly or objectively). What's good for the goose may not be so good for the gander!